john maxson

============================
From: Jon Berndt (jsb@hal-pc.borg)
Subject: SRB crossing hypothesis DEAD
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Date: 2002-06-02 06:30:02 PST


With the concurrence of those here, I'd like to declare the SRB crossing
hypothesis dead. Doing so might help reduce useless traffic here. The
hypothesis should be (should *have* been long ago) declared dead because (as
argued by myself and/or Daniel, et. al.):

1) Video evidence supports conclusively _no_crossing_
2) Flare evidence before and after supports conclusively _no_crossing_
3) Recovered hardware (identified via serial number, etc.) supports
_no_crossing_
4) Telemetry is agnostic, supporting neither

Jon
===============================
From: Roger Balettie (rbalettie@austin.rr.com)
Subject: Re: SRB crossing hypothesis DEAD
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Date: 2002-06-02 06:51:21 PST


Concur.

Roger
=================================
From: Mountain Camper (mountaincamper@lvcm.com.not-this)
Subject: Re: SRB crossing hypothesis DEAD
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Date: 2002-06-02 09:06:41 PST
"Roger Balettie" <rbalettie@austin.rr.com> wrote:


Concur, I'll put up a website with reference material for newbies when new
E-204 photographs come in from NASA.
============================