solos for training
<<Some CFIs don't know any better and endorse you for just "C-172".
However, its not legal or recognized by any FSDOs I know of.>>
Your understanding is not in accordance with the FAA position on the
matter. Why does this misconception keep propogating here, in spite
of ample FAA evidence to the contrary?
From the FAQs:
================================================== ================
Question: A very tiny minority of instructors are trying convince
others that a solo endor*****t needs to be made for every variation
of C172, such as for a 172M, 172N, 172P, 172R, 172S, etc.
Answer: Ref. § 61.87(l)(1); Per § 61.87(l)(1), ". . . . for the
specific make and model aircraft to be flown . . . ." means the make
(Cessna) and the model (172) only. It does not mean the series
variation of that make and model of aircraft.
However, flight instructors are the "cornerstone" to maintaining safe
pilots within our National Airspace System, and so if you believe
there is a significant difference between the series of a specific
make and model of aircraft, then I believe that you should limit your
solo endor*****t. For example, I believe there is a significant
difference between the Cessna 310 "A" series vs. the Cessna 310 "R"
series. I believe there is a significant difference between the Bell
206A vs. the Bell 206L3. I do not believe there is significant
difference between the different series variations of the Cessna 172.
But it has to be remembered that your students who you provide a solo
endor*****t to are low time, inexperienced beginning pilots. For some
students, something as simple as having to operate a different make
and model of navigation and communication radio may be enough of a
distraction to your student to require you to limit your solo
endor*****t. Essentially, this question and answer requires the use
of common sense.
Answered by: John D. Lynch, AFS-840
|