Visite Webhosting Latino, el site sobre alojamiento web.
Strange wording in Commercial experience requirement - Mombu the Aviation Forum
Mombu the Aviation Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Aviation Forum > Aviation > Strange wording in Commercial experience requirement
User Name
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links

1 2nd August 02:45
david brooks
External User
Posts: 1
Default Strange wording in Commercial experience requirement


(summarizing) It does sound awkward, but it makes sense...log 250 hours...10
of which are on proficiency areas...5 of which are at night

Thanks, Brian, you pointed out what I missed. I still think the English is
awkward, and it doesn't call the solo work "training" (cf the Private
requirement), but I get it. So, last night, I had a fine time preflighting,
taking off, landing (regular and short-field techniques), navigating, and
post-flighting, to commercial standards. The flying bit was nice too.

When I turned base back home, a rag that was tucked up by the left side
airvent came loose and dangled down. In my peripheral vision, my first
impression was that of a hand coming through the vent, causing a certain
adrenaline rush. My second thought was "damn, I won't be able to log solo".

To Bob: don't be so unkind. There are others around who try to compare what
the FARs say with what they mean, even if we all know what they mean. Or am
I coming across like Steve "315 degree downwind entry" McNicoll?

-- David Brooks
  Reply With Quote

  sponsored links


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Copyright 2006 - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -