Mombu the Aviation Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Aviation Forum > Aviation > Piper 6X vs C206
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links


Reply
 
1 17th August 16:15
l
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206



Hi All

I'm looking at purchasing either a new C206 or Piper 6x (for those of
you that don't know, this is the new fixed-gear Saratoga equivalent
which has recently been announced by Piper).

Anyone know any pro's/con's in actually owning/operating either of these
aircraft. Obviously noone will yet own a Piper 6x, but it looks like the
only difference between this and the Saratoga is the fixed gear, so
Saratogo owners/operators yell out!

Things I'm interested in are the typical maintenance costs such as
annuals, parts backlog and availability in Australia, build quality etc
etc I've flown a limited number of hours in both types and they're both
basically equally as enjoyable! The Piper may come out a smidgin in
front because of the low wing and the ensuing regular soft/passenger
pleasing/ego stroking landings. =) My decision will basically come down
to the pure economics of owning them.

Many thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide!

Cheers
L
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


2 17th August 16:15
ozzzpilot
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206



You mean the Cherokee Six with the tarted up interior and tapered wing dont
you?
It even has fewer windows like the old Chook 6


--
Trevor Fenn
There are too many zz's in my email address above.
Take two zz's and email me in the morning.

"Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just"
The Star Spangled Banner
Francis Scott Key
  Reply With Quote
3 17th August 16:15
pix
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206


Don't they now have the same engines?

cheers
pix
  Reply With Quote
4 17th August 16:16
ozzzpilot
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206


Wouldn't think so, should be maintainable anywhere, just like an FJ Holden.

--
Trevor Fenn
There are too many zz's in my email address above.
Take two zz's and email me in the morning.

"Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just"
The Star Spangled Banner
Francis Scott Key
  Reply With Quote
5 20th August 21:50
graeme hogan
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206


You don't need a mechanic for an FJ,
just a 1/2" spanner, pair of wire cutters and a farmers fence,
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


6 23rd August 06:04
martin taylor
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206


pix said....

pi> Don't they now have the same engines?

Nah. I think that each aircraft has its own engine(s). Makes it easier
to for aeroclubs to fly more than one at once, etc....

Sorry..

(long day at work. Quiet and bored....)

--

myself.com is really austarnet dot com dot au..
  Reply With Quote
7 23rd August 06:05
john duncan
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206


Add some 100 knot tape and you have a Piper toolkit!
  Reply With Quote
8 26th August 09:03
bernie samms
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper 6X vs C206


I have not seen the specs but I reckon the Piper will be faster but carry
less load and need more strip? The good old C206 can handle the tight stuff
very well and is not a charter company favourite for nothing. For private
use only you can judge. LAMEs in my opinion only need the books etc and they
work on em. They are all bloody primitive beasts in the LAME end. Its the
avionics that need experts. A plane is a plane etc at the LAME view of
single engine planes from what I have seen but lets hear what LAMEs think!
--
Bernie Samms
Kingston Beach Tasmania

Aero Club of Southern Tasmania http://www.acst.com.au
Prologic Pty Ltd http://www.prologic.com.au

Out Mail has been checked by Norton Anti Virus but no absolute guarantee is
made that mail or attachment(s) are virus free.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




Copyright © 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
666