![]() |
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
1
29th June 15:52
External User
Posts: 1
|
The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter256.htm Quote of the Week: "Chicago's airspace is already the most congested in the nation. The city's consultants simply ignored this,'' Sen. Fitzgerald commenting on safety of O'Hare Airport expansion plan --------------------------------------------------------------------- Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter #256.........................................Janua ry 25 , 2004 Past newsletters can be accessed at: http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm Bill Mulcahy rockaway@prodigy.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- FAA Threatens O'Hare Airport Communities With Night Flights!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------- As Bill Sees It: (Editorial): Media Hypes Phony "Scale Back" Of O'Hare Airport Flights: The O'Hare Expansion Plan atrocity is getting even nastier. This week the news media ran false headlines that announced that the FAA was going to make the airlines "scale back" flights at O'Hare Airport. They said this was because of because of "increased delays." While I knew that the only thing that makes delays at airports is the danger of a impeding disaster, I was surprised that the FAA was actually going to to reduce flights!!! But of course the FAA isn't going to reduce flights at all at O'Hare. They are going to move the "cut" flights from the daytime and "redistribute" them to the nighttime hours. This will of course increase the sleep disturbance of the already heavily impacted O'hare Airport communities!!! Of course this little fact was barely mentioned in the news stories. I believe this shifting of flights into the night hours will also give the FAA and the airport the opportunity to threaten and punish communities which have fought the O'Hare Expansion Plan. Perhaps they will be selected for one of the FAA's infamous "preferential" late-night overflight routes. How The FAA Uses "Preferential" Night Routes As A Punishment For Local Communities Fighting Noise: As the FAA is the most vicious, petty and conniving government agency ever to contaminate a government, I would not be surprised if the phony O'Hare flight "scale back" will be done to intimidate those communities which have been fighting the O'Hare Expansion Plan. I know from personal experience (see story at right) that the FAA has selected communities who give them trouble by selecting to use "preferential" nighttime overflight routes against them. They then cleverly use the media to tout this as a noise reducing effort!!! This "preferential" night routing is used not only to punish communities that protest their policy, it is also used as a tool to play communities off against each other. To achieve this noble goal the FAA bosses turn to their nefarious Office of Environment and Energy (AKA the Office of Technical Excuses) whose job is to find reasons to dump on the troublesome communities. New York City's Aviation Organization Gets A New Web Site: I see that New York City's Sane Aviation For Everyone (SAFE) has a new web site. I recently resigned from SAFE as a vice president and the "national" noise organization, Citizen's Aviation Watch (CAW), although not formerly yet, because of differences with Frans Verhagen (pictures at left and right), who is president of both organizations. Frans is now retired from teaching and supposedly will spend more of his time on aviation issues. I can't say I like the new web site better than the old one (which I designed), but it is better than I thought Frans would come up with. I will keep the old site for a few years with a link to the new site, even though Frans has not put a link to my newsletter on his SAFE site. I will also watch both groups VERY closely to make sure they are not working with the Aviation Cabal to "sustain" (Frans' favorite word is sustainability) aviation or its expansion. Florida Computer Glitch Grounds Planes: A "software glitch" knocked out computers, grounded flights and according to a news story "made it impossible for Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control Center to know the location of high-altitude planes flying into airspace stretching from the Panhandle to South Carolina." After the Florida incident the FAA spokesman said this "did not put passengers in danger" (yeah, right). Reduced Vertical Separation Of Planes Means Reduced Safety: With the FAA dangerously cutting by one half safety distances between planes beginning January 20, 2005 to "improve airport capacity;" how long will it be before there is a collision or another wake turbulence crash in the U.S.? Only the FAA degenerates would dare to say that reducing the legally allowed distances of aircraft isn't a reduction of safety in our overcrowded skies!!! What will the FAA's Administrator, (her ugliness) Marion Blakey, excuse be when there is a collision because of a software "glitch" like what happened in Florida this week? Sen. Fitzgerald: Expansion Would Change O'Hare Into A "Truly Frightening Airport:" Senator Fitzgerald A new report by a former Federal Aviation Administration official indicates Chicago's plan to expand O'Hare Airport would turn O'Hare into a "truly frightening airport'' due to congested airspace and other problems, Sen. Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-Ill.) charged Monday. Fitzgerald charged that a new ****ysis by Joseph Del Balzo of JDA Aviation Technology indicates the city ignored the expansion's impact on airspace congestion, and used other flawed assumptions in crafting its O'Hare Modernization Program. The new report was commissioned by the mayors of Bensenville and Elk Grove Village. http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-hare20.html Fitzgerald not giving up O'Hare fight: Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (R-Ill.) -- a watchdog against corruption and boondoggling -- is staging a dramatic, last-ditch stand against Mayor Daley's O'Hare expansion plan to forestall what key experts say may well be a threat to public safety, a huge waste of taxpayer money and a hindrance to civil aviation. http://www.suntimes.com/output/roeser/cst-edt-roes24.html Grand Canyon Air Tour Pilots Critical Of Proposed New FAA Rules: LAS VEGAS (AP) - New federal rules for sightseeing air tours are drawing criticism from pilots and tour operators who fly over the Grand Canyon and southern Nevada landmarks. The Federal Aviation Administration on Friday extended a public comment period to April 19, after pilots and flight organizations from across the country submitted more than 1,200 comments. The rules were announced in October. The rules, based on recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board, would affect 2,100 tour operators nationwide. They would install "basic safety requirements" for an industry that saw more than 100 accidents in the 1990s, the FAA has said. http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2004/jan/19/011910825.html Illinois: Low-Flying Helicopter Incidents Bother Resident John Menke: On his web site John Menke says "Helicopters & boom-boxes are terrorizing Mt. Vernon, Illinois. Why isn't something being done to stop it? Huge new helicopter noise record in October 2003" Read a newspaper articles about his complaint by clicking here and here. INDIA: Doctor Says Airport Is Causing Deafness!!! HYDERABAD: Incidence of sensory neural deafness is on a rise among residents in surrounding areas of Begumpet airport, thanks to the noise pollution from the flights even during the night time. With the proposed expansion of runway by 460 metres for allowing 747 Boeing, the future is scary for the residents. The Boeing has four engines pumping out nitrogen oxide, sulphur dioxide, carbon non oxide and other poisonous gases. There has definitely been a rise in cases of sensory neural deafness because of the noise pollution, senior consultant, ENT surgeon, Dr Venu Gopal Reddy who works at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences told The Times of India. Dr Venu claims that such deafness is usually caused in the age group of 65 to 70 years. But among residents near the airport, it is seen among those between 55 to 65 years, he said. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/403426.cms JACKSONVILLE, Fla.: Computer Glitch Erases Jacksonville Flight Plans, Grounds Planes: A software problem caused Federal Aviation Administration computers to erase flight plans, grounding regional air traffic for more than an hour. The computer glitch at an operations center in Hilliard made it impossible for Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control Center to know the location of high-altitude planes flying into airspace stretching from the Panhandle to South Carolina, FAA spokesman Christopher White said. As a precaution, planes scheduled to enter the area were grounded until the problem was fixed. http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/breaking_news/7778947.htm @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Important Aviation News Stories This Week Foes: Skies can't handle O'Hare expansion January 20, 2004 BY ROSALIND ROSSI Staff Reporter A new report by a former Federal Aviation Administration official indicates Chicago's plan to expand O'Hare Airport would turn O'Hare into a "truly frightening airport'' due to congested airspace and other problems, Sen. Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-Ill.) charged Monday. Although city officials disputed the new report, which was commissioned by expansion opponents, Fitzgerald said it indicates the danger, disruption, and air and land congestion the expansion would cause is not worth the minimum 400,000 new landings it would add to the world's busiest airport. Fitzgerald charged that a new ****ysis by Joseph Del Balzo of JDA Aviation Technology indicates the city ignored the expansion's impact on airspace congestion, and used other flawed assumptions in crafting its O'Hare Modernization Program. The new report was commissioned by the mayors of Bensenville and Elk Grove Village. "Chicago's airspace is already the most congested in the nation. The city's consultants simply ignored this,'' Fitzgerald said at a news conference Monday. "It's possible to add more runways but you can't add more airspace.'' Del Bazo's report charged that the city did not consider flights from Midway, Milwaukee, DuPage County and other surrounding airports that overlap the air routes of planes from O'Hare, already the worst-delayed airport in the nation. It called this a "glaring deficiency.'' At Monday's news conference, Del Baso said the city's plan would turn the skies above O'Hare into "an accident waiting to happen.'' Two other FAA officials, David Hinton and Jonathan Howe, were so troubled by Del Baso's report that they have volunteered their own time to guide further ****ysis, Del Baso said. However, Rosemarie Andolino, executive director of the O'Hare Modernization Plan, said airspace comments by the FAA cited in Del Bazo's report were made in response to the city's original plan. That plan has since been revised and has not triggered any FAA concerns about air congestion, Andolino said. The city has run every simulation requested by the FAA and "Our plan took into account FAA industry standards,'' Andolino said. "I'm confident they know how to operate an airport effectively and would give us the correct modeling.'' Del Baso's report also charged that the city overestimated the percent of excellent weather conditions under which pilots and air traffic controllers normally operate at O'Hare. It said the city assumed that planes would hold 13 more passengers per plane than they currently average, and ignored increased taxiing time of three minutes per plane that the new runway configuration would cause. Fitzgerald said the Kennedy Expy., the Northwest Tollway and O'Hare Airport terminals would have to be expanded to handle the new passengers filing into O'Hare, raising the total bill to $15 billion to add "a puny 400,000 more passengers'' a year to O'Hare. Any road changes required by the plan must be addressed by the state, not the city, Andolino said. But the runway upgrades are necessary to enhance O'Hare's efficiency and maintain its standing as an economic engine for the Chicago area, she said. "If we had a modern airfield, we wouldn't have the problems we have today,'' Andolino said. "These are paid consultants who are trying to justify themselves . . . by casting aspersions on our program. We are working the with real guys, the real FAA and those are the people we need to work with.'' |
|
|