Mombu the Culture Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Culture Forum > Culture > The Real Saddam??????
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links


Reply
 
1 8th April 09:12
light templar
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default The Real Saddam??????



Can you prove that the U.S.'s intentions are other than what they say they
are? Iraqi doctors oversaw the
disposition of the bodies, and the DNA testing. Iraqi doctors also
examined Saddam. Saddam lied about
having the WMD, his son-in-laws turned over paperwork confirming that fact.
When you run around lying about
such things, you really can't blame others for what the results are.

Remember, the UN also confirmed the existence of WMD in 1993, so who,
exactly, would you suggest as an
"Independent party". In reality, there is no such party.

In the long run, it doesn't make a damned bit of difference whether you
believe it or not, does it?
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


2 8th April 09:12
sunspot
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default The Real Saddam??????



True. Besides we know that CIA exaggerated Saddam's WMD stockpile.
If Saddam had them, he will most certainly use them before
capitulating. The reason why WMD was not used against the 'willing
allies' is he has no such weapons.

Yep. For the single reason to remove a despot, a war is justified.
  Reply With Quote
3 8th April 09:12
george
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default The Real Saddam??????


No need to aargue.
The WMD are all over the country in big rat holes.
Start looking in Titkrit....
  Reply With Quote
4 8th April 09:13
s.b.balaji
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default The Real Saddam??????


As in my first post, I quote myself:

Quote: "Any one would have guessed that this is all another cover up job on
Bush's side to make them look good having failed in capturing Bin Ladin and
the consistant bombing attacks by the resistance goup in Iraq. Bush is due
for re-election and his getting another new term depends very much on this
war outcome. Without capturing Saddam (the real one) and Bin Ladin, and
with the constant body bags leaving Iraq, it is a wonder that Bush is not
kicked out of the White House sooner...." End Quote

Anyway, this is a typical case of aggression against middle-east race.
After Sept 11, Bush was unable to get hole of Bin Ladin, so he goes after
Iraq. Do you recall that he nearly send his troops down to Iran after
attacking Iraq? Luckily for Iran, Bush has no strong case against Iran, or
else we will find that US empire covering up almost half of middle east.
(for Oil?)
  Reply With Quote
5 8th April 22:31
observer
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default The Real Saddam??????


Don't need to....its your job to prove
its correct if you want others to believe you...bozo....LOL

Yeah right.....and because you said so...it
is to be taken as a fact...


Huh?
Have you found to prave that he lied?...LOL


What fact?
That WMD is still yet to be found?....LOL


Which Hans Blix said that ho found
none....just before the assault on Iraq...


And therefore, by default...we have to believe you?.....LOL

Then why are you responding?....LOL


they
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




Copyright © 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
666