amigocabal

....ISRAEL TREATS PALESTINIAN?

A Modest Proposal for the Suppression of Negro Terrorism in the United
States

By Tefel Hall
12 November 2002

tefelhall@msn.com

What would happen if America treated Blacks the same way that Israel treats
Palestinians? This paper proposes just that. It is modeled after Jonathan
Swift's satirical essay, "A Modest Proposal For Preventing the Poor People
in Ireland From Being Aburden to Their Parents or Country, and For Making
Them Beneficial to The Public."

What is the proper name for black-on-white violence? Let us call it what it
is: Negro terrorism. How else can we label the kind of violence which rocked
Cincinnati last year? Syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin gave us this
disturbing account of those riots at the time:

This mid-Western city has been under siege since Monday, its downtown and
surrounding suburbs overrun by black demonstrators targeting innocent white
bystanders and businesses. Roving thugs have looted dozens of white-owned
shops, burned down several buildings, and vandalized police precincts and
fire stations. City Hall, which had 28 windows smashed to bits on Monday
night, is under lockdown. So is the Cincinnati police headquarters, where an
American flag was pulled down from its flagpole and hung upside down.

It would be nice to imagine that such incidents are rare, but they are not.
For example, in 1991, Negro mobs terrorized New York City's Crown Heights
neighborhood, screaming "Heil Hitler" as they smashed cars, stoned homes,
and looted Jewish-owned stores (qtd. in Malkin). And from Seattle to New
Orleans, Negro terrorists have brutalized whites, shouting incitements such
as, "Hey, there's another whitey; let's kick his ass"(qtd. in Malkin).

The solution

The problem of Negro terrorism may seem intractable, but in fact it is
easily solved. All that is required is some innovative thinking, and it is
in this spirit that I make the following proposal: the US Congress should
immediately repeal the 14th and 15th amendments to the US Bill of Rights. By
repealing the 14th amendment, we could deny Negroes due process and equal
protection under the law; by repealing the 15th amendment, we could also
deny them the right to vote. With these simple changes, whites could once
again gain supremacy over their own homeland.

Naturally, a few minor technicalities would have to be overcome. For
example, our legislators would have to define exactly who is a "Negro." In
the 19th century, Negroes were sometimes defined as anyone with "one drop"
of Negro blood, while to be considered white, one had to have "pure" white
ancestry (Wikipedia). Such criteria may be too stringent for modern
sensibilities, but that should not discourage us from trying to define race.
Instead, we might look at the example of another democracy with a terrorism
problem: Israel. Israel is probably the only western democracy that still
has race laws, and the way that Israel enforces these laws should prove
helpful to us in America.

For example, Israeli law currently defines a "Jew" as anyone with at least
one Jewish grandparent (M.F.A.). Following this model, the U.S. might
stipulate that anyone who wished to be classified as "white" must prove that
their ancestry is at least one-quarter northern European. And, like Israel,
we could periodically alter this definition, in order to ensure that the
white race always has a substantial political majority.

Israel also provides us with an excellent example of how we might deflect
charges of racism. Artfully, Israel has relatively few laws which are
explicitly racist, and since most of these laws deal with immigration, it is
hard to unequivocally denounce them. After all, is it not the right of every
country to control its immigration policy, even to the extent of admitting
or rejecting only certain races?

This argument, however, is a ruse. The clever deception is neatly explained
by Menron Benvenisti, a former deputy mayor of Jerusalem:

The outrage over the Drukman Law [that would have allowed the establishment
of communities for Jews only] was attributed to its being the first time
that the country's lawbooks would explicitly refer to different laws for
Jews and non-Jews, other than the Law of Return. But in the 54 years of the
state's existence, an entire lexicon of laundered euphemisms have obviated
the need to bluntly define ethno-national discrimination-ranging from "the
absentees," to "army veterans" and "those eligible for citizenship according
to the Law of Return." Most of the national-ethnic discrimination is carried
out by the Zionist institutions-the Jewish National Fund and the Jewish
Agency-and they were deliberately established so the state would not be
accused of deviation from universal norms.


Is that not clever? America, too, could follow such a strategy. Having
repealed the 14th and 15th amendments, we could then pass an innocuous
sounding immigration law, and use that law to define the people who are
eligible for other rights. Think of the possibilities:

1) We could take away the political rights of all Negroes and other
nettlesome minorities (about 1/3 of our total population). If anyone thinks
this percentage is unjustly high, we can point out that Israel also denies
1/3 of its inhabitants the right to vote, based solely on their race
(Footnote 2).

2) We could also abridge the rights of an additional 11% of our population,
just like Israel (Footnote 3). These restrictions should be targeted at
knee-jerk liberals, who may be tempted to provide support for terrorist
minorities.

3) We could establish "white-only" communities similar to the "Jewish-only"
settlements which can be found throughout Israel (Masra). That way,
law-abiding white Americans would not have to live next door to Negro
terrorists.

4) We could establish a network of "white-only" roads, just as Israel has
built a network of roads for "Jews-only" (Palestinian Society for the
Protection of Human Rights and the Environment). In America, such roads
would allow whites to travel without the inconvenience or danger of passing
through Negro neighborhoods. To further control Negro terrorists, we might
also institute a system of military checkpoints, which Negroes would have to
pass through anytime they traveled anywhere. Whites, of course, would not be
stopped nor have to wait at these choke-points.

5) Utility companies could give the lion's share of America's resources to
whites. A report by the Israeli Human Rights Organization B' Tselem suggests
the potential benefits:

The discrimination between Palestinians and Israeli settlers regarding the
supply of water is especially conspicuous in the many cases where
settlements are located near a Palestinian town or village and are connected
to the same Mekorot [Israel Water Authority] well. While the settlers
benefit from an unlimited quantity of running water - including filling
swimming pools and watering lawns, the Palestinian towns and villages suffer
a severe shortage of running water, even for drinking and bathing. The
report [which follows this introduction] shows that the immediate reason for
the shortage is Israel's discriminatory policy, employed through Mekorot.
This policy includes drastically reducing the allotment of water for
Palestinian towns and villages during the summer months in order to meet the
increasing consumption in Israel and the Israeli settlements (Lein).

Furthermore, municipal authorities could increase the cost of water for
Negroes, while decreasing the cost for whites. Apparently, such tactics are
useful for fighting terrorism: Why else would Palestinians in Israel's West
Bank be charged three times as much per unit of water as Israeli settlers?
(Environment News Service).

We could also provide free electricity and sewage to many white households,
while depriving Negro towns of adequate services. Israel does this sort of
thing, apparently with good results (U.N. Committee on Economic, Social &
Cultural Rights; Stop US aid to Israel).

6) Using Israel as a model, we could reestablish segregation in our schools.
Think of all the terrorism which might thus be prevented, not to mention all
the money we could save. According to a report by Human Rights Watch:

The Israeli government operates two separate school systems, one for Jewish
children and one for Palestinian Arab children. Discrimination against
Palestinian Arab children colors every aspect of the two systems. Education
Ministry authorities have acknowledged that the ministry spends less per
student in the Arab system than in the Jewish school system.

7) I am sure we would also find it profitable to deprive Negroes of other
basic rights: for example, the right to assemble peacefully, the right to a
free press, the right to obtain a car licence, the right to start a
business, the right to buy industrial equipment, the right to export farm
products, the right to run for political office, the right to a lawyer, the
right to a trial, the right to travel abroad, equal access to government
benefits such as welfare, health care, and veteran's loans, the right to
carry a firearm, the right to go to the beach, the right to attend an
Israeli university, the right to leave home without first obtaining
permission, the right to walk to the corner market without being killed by
American-made weapons of mass destruction, etc., etc., etc.

Under America's new laws, most Negroes would have none of these rights, and
the few who did, their rights would be strictly limited, being subject in
all cases to the arbitrary rulings of white military authorities. These
measures can hardly be considered draconian, as Israel routinely denies
these same rights to its Arab non-citizen minority (Davidsson, Haas).

A minor drawback

As I have already mentioned, one drawback of this plan is that it might
invite charges of racism. For example, the United States might find itself
the target of scathing UN reports, such as the one from which the following
excerpt is taken:

The [UN] Committee [on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights] notes with
concern that the Government of Israel does not accord equal rights to its
Arab citizens, although they comprise over 19 per cent of the total
population. This discriminatory attitude is apparent in the lower standard
of living of Israeli Arabs as a result, inter alia, of lack of access to
housing, water, electricity and health care and their lower levels of
education . . .(UN Committee on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights).

Such reports might indeed be embarrassing, but why should we place undo
importance on the opinions of UN committees or our European allies? White
Americans are fighting for their lives, hemmed in on all sides by Negro
terrorism. Just ask Reginal Denny, who was dragged from his truck during the
L.A. Race Riots. Besides, in the end, we can always do what Israel does when
confronted with such reports: we can simply ignore them.

Realpolitik

Some people are sure to say that my plan, while theoretically appealing, is
not politically feasible. They will say: How can we muster the political
majority needed to repeal those two amendments?

Nonsense. I am quite confident that this is actually the least of our
hurdles. Why wouldn't all Americans embrace these revisions to our laws? To
gauge American opinion on these matters, one need only look again toward
Israel. Isn't Israel America's darling, despite its racist policies? Don't
we give it our unwavering support? We can even quantify that support, by
noting that the average US taxpayer donates $53 dollars to Israel every year
(Footnote 4). And there seems to be no end to the goodwill our legislators
extend that country! Every week, it seems, another resolution passes through
our congress, showering Israel with additional monies, as well as an almost
sycophantic support for its war against terrorists. As Americans, if we
truly believe that Israel is doing an exemplary job of combating terrorism,
then why wouldn't we wholly endorse Israel's racist policies for ourselves?
Certainly, the Jewish lobby and Evangelical Christians can both be counted
on for their uncritical support.

Conclusion

In 1948, Israel was established by Jews, for Jews, and ever since, Jewish
leaders have steadfastly proclaimed the importance of maintaining the Jewish
character of their state. Their resolve is worthy of our admiration-and
their methods for controlling disenfranchised minorities are worthy of
imitation. What works for Jews in Israel could work just as well for whites
here in America.

For let us never forget that America, similarly, was founded by whites, for
whites. And it is only through our own neglect that we have allowed the
white character of our great nation to be degraded. But it is not too late.
My proposal is simple and modest: we should repeal the 14th and 15th
amendments, then perhaps finagle a few other laws in order to allow us to
fully exclude blacks and other impure races from our American political
system. Then we could return to the way of life that our founding fathers
intended.

And let us not forget that Negroes will also benefit from this proposal, for
none can truly question the enlightened nature of white rule. Under our
benevolent guidance, Negroes will prosper, to a degree, and eventually learn
to be content in their subordinate place. If they do not, then we may have
to resort to more sweeping measures, such as the ones currently being
contemplated in Israel. We may have to "transfer" all our Negroes back to
Africa.

Footnotes


1. Between 1868-1951, there were 32 major race riots (Ward). Between
1951-2002, there have been at least eight more.

2. Approximately 3 million Palestinian Arabs who live within Israel's de
facto borders cannot vote in Israeli elections (Haas). The only thing which
disqualifies them from citizenship is their race.

3. An additional 1 million Israeli-Arabs do have Israeli citizenship; but,
according to David Kretzmer, a professor of law: " . . .[The Law of
Political Parties (1992) and the amendment of section 7A(1)] implies that,
on a decidedly fundamental level, there is no real equality between Arab and
Jew in Israel."

4. Based on $7 billion projected aid to Israel (Yackley and Zunes) divided
by 131,963,700 projected individual tax returns (Internal Revenue Service).

bernardz

In article <Wy2Pb.16177$q4.13789@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
pinkspider123@earthlink.com says...


Very funny Alex.

The mind just boggles at the similarity of the example you quote of
comparing these Negro groups to PA gunman and bombers.

--
Jumping up and down like a baboon on the disco floor is not dancing.

33th observation of Bernard

amigocabal

Mind boggles at your idiocy, taking one paragraph out of context does not
illuminate the substance. What a moron!

bernardz

In article <idaPb.16321$i4.14284@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
pinkspider123@earthlink.com says...


My good friend its hardly out of context. Its the main crux of his
argument.

--
Jumping up and down like a baboon on the disco floor is not dancing.

33th observation of Bernard

susan cohen

If Blacks in this country behaved with as much virulent criminality as the
so-called Palestinians, we'd have a police state & no one would dare say a
thing.
It's the anti-Israeli double-standard at work, & the moron knows it. Susan