More Racism Against Christians.
Zhid-watch
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106123,00.html
Town Says 'No' to Nativity Scene, 'Yes' to Menorah
Thursday, December 18, 2003
PALM BEACH, Fla. - A federal judge has given the town of Palm Beach
(search), Fla., until 5 p.m. Thursday to come up with a good reason
why Christ in a manger should not be displayed next to a menorah on
public property.
Town officials are saying "no" to putting up a Nativity scene next to
a Jewish menorah (search) in a popular park on public property.
A few years ago, a rabbi in Palm Beach fought the same town leadership
to put a menorah on public property. But after lawyers got involved,
the town relented.
This year, two women wanted a Christ in a manger display next to the
menorah but the town refused, saying the Nativity scene could only be
placed in a lesser-trafficked park.
The women filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination and arguing that the
Supreme Court (search) allows a balance of the two. For the past two
years, for example, menorahs have been placed next to the more
politically correct "secular holiday trees."
One of the plaintiffs told Fox News she asked to speak before the town
council to make her case but was refused.
"They've discriminated against us," said Maureen Donnell. "They allow
the menorahs but they have absolutely no interest in these Nativity
scenes."
What Donnell and her co-plaintiff want is for the the menorah and the
Nativity scene to be displayed next to each other.
But Palm Beach town attorney John Randolph said case law shows that
when a menorah is placed next to a secular symbol -- such as a
"secular holiday tree" -- it isn't considered a religious symbol.
Click here to watch a fair and balanced report by Fox News Channel's
Orlando Salinas.
----------------------------------------
My name is Ken McVay. I WILL **** **** FOR MONEY, I love ****ing-off big
black nigger ****s, Yum Yum.
|