![]() |
|
|
|
|
1
2nd July 00:25
External User
Posts: 1
|
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Letters.html
I am tired of listening to the whining coming out of the Asian press regarding the American backlash against excessive outsourcing and excessive use of the H-1B and L-1 visas [Challenges ahead for India's IT boom, Aug 1]. How easy it is to be judgmental towards American workers supplanted by workers in lower-waged Asian countries. How many people in Asia would allow Americans to come to work in their countries and take jobs away from their workers? So before you all get caught up in your own feeling of moral superiority, think that over. From the perspective of multinational corporations there is only one reason for globalization - obscene profits. It's no secret to Americans that business privacy laws in many Asian countries protect multinational corporations from disclosing their obscene profits. Where is all that money going? To Chinese laborers? Give me a break - it's ending up in some CEO's numbered Swiss bank account or to the Chinese Communist Party so they can build more ballistic missiles to threaten Taiwan and others. If you think that the Communist Party or the multinationals are going to let wages rise for the Chinese laborer, get with the program. If anything, wages will stagnate and possibly deteriorate, because they'll forcefully crush any attempts to unionize. Trust me - these guys have no end to their greed. I'll bet you don't know that in Mexico workers have seen their standard of living drop 27 percent in the past five years while more American jobs have moved there. That isn't supposed to be the way it works, is it? Well, the multinationals keep wages dirt-cheap the old-fashioned way - they cave people's heads in if they organize. NAFTA [North American Free Trade Agreement] has been a lose-lose proposition for the populations of both countries. How did this lousy piece of legislation pass the US Congress? Let me give you a hint: it isn't NAFTA - it's GRAFT-A. I n our blessed American democracy, Bush No 1 and Congress debated NAFTA behind closed doors. Nobody was allowed to see what was going on. Later it was established that Mexico spent US$500 million lobbying Congress for its assage. It's a generally accepted principal of lobbying that the amount of bribe money required is directly proportional to the amount of lime required to cover up the stench. Interestingly, George Bush No 2 has failed to extend NAFTA throughout South America as planned. Many of the countries have decided that they did the banana-republic thing before - no thanks. So as you toast the multinationals for bringing jobs to Asia, just remember what they are really there for. They don't give a damn about you - they only want to squeeze every penny of profit out of you. As for the Chinese inner circle who also are skimming off the lard - as they pump more and more of their newfound wealth into the Chinese military and ballistic-missile program - I think you all should take a moment and reflect on Tiananmen Square and ask if you are getting closer to or farther away from democracy. Dan Hearn USA (Aug 4, '03) |
|
|
|