ruhig

Some questions on the Embargo

© 2003 By Ralph Rewes


Q. Why is it so difficult to the USA to justify the embargo against Cuba?

A. Because we are talking about a stryggke between a democratic nation with
laws, principles and a long tradition of freedom to dissent against the
power of a totalitarian dictator with absolutely no scruples, no laws, no
principles, one who invests more money in propaganda and buying proselytes
than freeing the food Cuba produces to feed his people. Few people, blinded
by the fantastic apparatus of Cuban propaganda, realize that Cuba has the
capacity to feed itself and feed itself well, that the hunger and want the
people suffer is the chained result of selling their food to Europe and
China, and wasting the profits in Messianic political adventures!

Q. How effective is the embargo?

A. Only partially effective. It is a joke as to getting what the Cuban
Military regime needs to support its repressive forces, defense mechanism,
intelligence, espionage, etc. However, it prevents the Military Dictatorship
from getting free moneys from American loans they do not intend to pay back,
as they have done with other countries. The economic crisis in Cuba does not
have anything to do with the embargo, but with the pyramid effect of
communism and the moneys spent in instigators, journalists, congresses,
international front associations, spies all over the world (not only in the
USA), buying political favors, like congressmen¹s pledge to lobby for Castro
in exchange of cash purchases from their state. Lately, Commandant Castro is
betting good money in free elections in Latin American and, most probably in
the USA, to elect friends. This is a risky game, but he thinks he had an
outstanding success in electing Hugo Chávez, hoping to keep him under tight
control.

Q. But Communists lost a lot with the downfall of the Soviet Union, how can
an Inspector Clouseau* economy still work?

A. The Communist empire might have fallen, but thousand of frustrated
followers, the Lumpencommunists rallied around a few Lumpencommunist
dictatorships, with the help of a powerful media-controlling fifth column in
the USA (some of them very rich bubble heads), are providing an invaluable
help against the USA, just out of spite and hate. The former Soviet rulers
left behind a powerful mechanism used during the war in Vietnam at an
unbelievable high cost, the so called ³peace² movements.

Q. Are they working now?

A. Yes, they are now retreating to re-examining their tactics and strategy,
but they are there, corroding every institution they have already gained
control of. However, circumstances have changed. They tried marches during
their siding with Sadam, but these marches are very expensive, and they were
overdoing it and it backfired on them. Clichés are poor and lack
originality, ³blood for oil² please!Š They carry on their unscrupulous
campaign in the most inappropriate moments. They are being perceived as what
they are the worst elements of our society, taking side with the enemy, any
enemy.

Q. Why are the media following their every step?

A. Although still widely infiltrated by the political Lumpencommunists, the
media now is not so monolithically Leftist-controlled as it was during the
Vietnam war. Fox News, for once, has opened the eyes of a large audience.
During the Vietnam war although American pro-Communists were puppets of the
Soviet Union¹s expansion, at least they were pretending a good cause.
Presently, they are backing known dictators, especially the remaining
Lumpencommunist dictatorships. And even if some rich Arab private or
official patrons are picking up the tab now, they are exposing themselves
too much for their own comfort.

Q. Why the American Left is so adamantly against the embargo, if the lifting
of sanctions would mean zilch to our country?

A. Because they are afraid that, if the embargo succeeds in Cuba, their
most beloved totalitarian idol may fall down. In the mind of some American
idiots-savants intellectuals, Castro is still a romantic figure, a Caribbean
Robin Hood (I fail to understand why these limousine Communists love thieves
with such a passion).

Q. Why they hate Bush so intensely?

A. They don¹t hate Bush; they hate what he represents. They fear that Bush
could wipe out the power the fanatic Communist Leftover still has in the
United States. The Korean and the Caribbean red nuts are surviving heroes
for them ‹ never mind the thousands of innocent victims both have in their
memories. Without them, they think, the Communist Leftover will be
completely discredited, however it seems to be the opposite.

Cuba and Communism

http://ruhig.0catch.com/cu.html