ng_poster

Hey man, here's the full text, apparently, of the UK's Independent
article that was cited, which is now available only for a fee from
that site, given the length of time which has elapsed (many news sites
do this, charge for archival material):

http://home.earthlink.net/~platter/a...-buncombe.html


I can't believe you actually googled for this topic....

BTW, just 'cause one doesn't see our US media covering this doesn't
mean in and of itself that the story's not newsworthy...there have
been many instances of US media not covering a story which makes
front-page headlines in Europe or Asia....

byker

That's because the use of napalm isn't newsworthy on our side of the pond.
It's just another weapon in our inventory, period.

Let these people learn: If you go to war with us, it's going to be the
sorriest fucking day of your goddamed life.....

peter h.m. brooks

Yes, they learn from your attitude. Hence the destruction of the Twin
Towers.

It is really so terribly clever to have such contempt for humainty - I think
you should be awarded the insect superbrain of the week award.


--
Middle age is when you're sitting at home on a Saturday night and the
telephone rings and you hope that it isn't for you - 'It takes all sorts'
Milton Shulman

nash

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:36:13 +0200, "Peter H.M. Brooks"
<peter@new.co.za> spewed forth:


The only reason they didn't attack the UK is because they would have
been laffed of the face of the earth.


Sorry, Tony Blair already got that one.


--