25th April 09:36
L.A., CA: Did agent provacateur Jews pose as "Arab terrorists" at Mex protest?
Needless to say, I disagree with La Voz de Aztlan 100% regarding the
illegal immigration crisis: "La Voz de Aztlan" is for illegal
immigration, I'm an immigration reform activist who's against it.
However, in my opinion the above quote is quite accurate, and I've
been patiently waiting for a couple of weeks now for mention of this
issue to be made: As soon as I saw the two young white guys who were
purportedly loudly protesting the "Save Our State" members who were
demonstrating against the outrageous pro-reconquista Baldwin Park
monument I realized they were likely Jewish agents provocateur.
Note, for example, the one guy wearing the Arab head scarf as they
both -- situated right at the very front of the pro-reconquista
protestors, literally right up against the police line where they'd be
assured of being seen in all the news videos and photos of he event --
as they both very boisterously shout, "INTIFADA! INTIFADA!" I strongly
urge anyone reading this to visit the "Save Our State" website's forum
and view the videos of the "Battle For Baldwin Park" linked from there
for themselves. You will immediately see what I'm referring to.
My strong suspicion is that the pair were Israel-First Zionist
extremists, very possibly affiliated with the Jewish Defense League
and/or Jewish Defense Organization or similar groups.
Why would this pair show up at the "Save Our State" rally and,
dressed like youthful Yasser Arafats, try to leave the impression that
they were PRO-reconquistas?
Well, then again, why would the (Jew) Hal Netkin, still smarting
from the failure of his years-long crusade to prevent "anti-Israel"
reconquista Antonio Villaraigosa to win the Los Angeles mayor's
office, put up a website which from the very beginning denounces
Villaraigosa for his "anti-Israel" associations?
As anyone who's at all familiar with Jews knows, the main
consideration for perhaps most of them when deciding what side of an
issue they're going to be on is, "Is it good for the Jews?" [The works
of California college professor Dr. Kevin McDonald are some of the
best on this topic.]
The fact is that only recently have Jews in large numbers become
"awakened" to the illegal alien/reconquista crisis in America, and the
reason for this is that they've only recently come to the realization
that the hordes of Mexican and other Third World nationals who are
colonizing the USA either don't give a rat's *ss about their beloved
"Israel" or else, more ominously, actively oppose Israel's theft of
Arab land and "ethnic cleansing" policies and, once they dominate the
purse strings of the US Government, will be much less likely than
Anglo-Americans have traditionally been to keep the outlaw state of
"Israel" alive with massive infusions of money and weapons.
Indeed, as the website "La Voz de Aztlan" illustrates very well,
there's a strong overt identification in some elements of the
pro-reconquista movement with the plight of the dispossesed
While I myself, like increasing numbers of fair-minded Americans,
sympathize greatly with the quite legitimate claims of the indiginous
Palestinians who've been so brutally ethnically cleansed by "Israel"
from their ancestral land I simultaneously reject the cynical Mexican
reconquistas' (as typified by "La Voz de Aztlan") attempt to hijack
the plight of the Palestinians for their own purposes. (One is
reminded, in this respect, of how the Mexican reconquistas -- most of
whom, ironically, harbor quite racist anti-Black attitudes -- in
recent years similarly and outrageously hijacked the legitimate civil
rights era struggles of African-American citizens by staging bus-based
quasi-"Million Man Marches"/"Freedom Rides" of illegal aliens to
Washington, D.C. to (illegitimately) demand "rights" for
Mexican/Hispanic illegal aliens.)
Again, I urge anyone reading this to go back and watch the videos of
"The Battle For Baldwin Park" and view the two (to my eyes, very
Jewish-looking and sounding) young men at the front of the
pro-reconquista crowd who were so loudly, single-mindedly and
obviously focused on trying to leave the impression in observers'
minds that the reconquista side was to be identified with
I should add, too, that I likewise have my doubts about the weird,
dark-complected (blackface?), purportedly anti-"Save Our State" guy at
the protest who was wearing the Muslim skullcap and shouting
pro-Zarqawi drivel (Zarqawi being Osama bin Laden's right-hand man, as
per the US media.) From the moment I heard him I was struck by his
NYC-Jewish accent and, while I'm less certain of his true bona fides,
it would not surprise me at all if he, too -- as someone who obviously
went out of his way to establish a link in observers' minds between
the reconquista crowd and "Muslim terrorists" -- was yet another
Zionist extremist JDL/JDO agent provocateur. [See this:
and this: http://www.civilamerica.org/pages/15/ and this:
"So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld . . .
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government . . . Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.
" . . . nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest."
-- President George Washington
September 26, 1796