LA VOZ DE AZTLAN: Minutemen Terrorists Stashing Weapons and Explosives
Needless to say, I disagree with La Voz de Aztlan 100% regarding the
ilegal immigration crisis.
However, the above quote is quite accurate, and I've been patiently
waiting for a couple of weeks now for mention of this issue to be
made: As soon as I saw the two young white guys who were purportedly
loudly protesting the "Save Our State" members who were demonstrating
against the outrageous pro-reconquista Baldwin Park monument I
realized they were Jewish agents provocateur. Note the one guy wearing
the Arab head scarf as they both -- situated right at the very front
of the pro-reconquista protestors, actually right up against the
police line where they'd be assured of being in all the video and
photos of he event -- as they both laughably and very boisterously
shouted, "INTIFADA! INTIFADA!" I strongly urge anyone reading this to
visit the "Save Our State" website's forum and view the videos of the
"Battle For Baldwin Park" linked from there. You will immediately see
what I'm referring to.
My strong suspicion is that the pair were Israel-First Zionist
extremists of the Jewish Defense League and/or Jewish Defense
Organization.
Why would this pair show up at the "Save Our State" rally and,
dressed like youthful Yasser Arafats, try to leave the impression that
they were pro-reconquistas?
Why would the Jew Hal Netkin, still smarting from the failure of his
years-long crusade to prevent "anti-Israel" reconquista Antonio
Villaraigosa to win the Los Angeles mayor's office, put up a website
which from the very beginning denounces Villaraigosa fro his
"anti-Israel" associations?
Well, as anyone who's at all familiar with Jews knows, the main
consideration for perhaps most of them when deciding what side of an
issue they're going to be on is, "Is it good for the Jews?" [The works
of California college professor Dr. Kevin McDonald are some of the
best on this.] The fact is that only recently have Jews become
"awakened" to the illegal alien/reconquista crisis in America, and the
reason why is that they've only recently come to the realization that
the hordes of Mexican and other Third World nationals who are
colonizing the USA don't give a rat's *ss about their beloved
"Israel". Indeed, as the website "La Voz de Aztlan" illustrates very
well, there's a strong overt identification in some elements of the
pro-reconquista movement with the plight of the dispossesed
Palestinians.
While I myself, like increasing numbers of fair-minded Americans,
sympathize greatly with the indiginous Palestinians who've been so
brutally "ethnically cleansed" from their ancestral land I
simultaneously reject the cynical Mexican reconquistas' (as typified
by "La Voz de Aztlan") attempt to hijack the plight of the
Palestinians for their own purposes. (One is reminded, in this
respect, of how the Mexican reconquistas -- most of whom, ironically,
harbor quite racist anti-Black attitudes -- in recent years similarly
"hijacked" the civil rights era struggles of US Blacks by staging
bus-based quasi-Million Man Marches to Washington, D.C. to demand
"rights" for Mexican/Hispanic illegal aliens.)
Again, I urge anyone reading this to go back and watch the videos of
"The Battle For Baldwin Park" and view on the two (to my eyes, very
Jewish-looking) young men at the front of the pro-reconquista crowd
who were so loudly and single-mindedly and obviously focused on trying
to leave the impression in observers' minds that the reconquistas are
to be identified with "Arab/Palestinian terrorists". I should add,
too, that I likewise have my doubts about the dark-complected
(blackface?), purportedly anti-"Save Our State" guy at the protest who
was wearing the skullcap and shouting pro-Zarqawi nonsense (Zarqawi
being Osama bin Laden's right-hand man.) From the moment I heard him I
was struck by his NYC-Jewish accent and, while I'm less certain of his
true motives, it would not surprise me at all if he -- as someone who
obviously went out of his way to establish a link between the
reconquista crowd and "Muslim terrorists" -- was another Zionist
extremist JDL/JDO agent provocateur. [See this:
http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_26_01/U_S__Army_Officers_Say___Mossa/u_s__army_officers_say___mossa.html
and this: http://www.civilamerica.org/pages/15/ and this:
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=293648085
..]
"So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld . . .
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government . . . Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.
" . . . nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest."
-- President George Washington
Farewell Address
September 26, 1796
|