--= ö§âmâ ßíñ këñ0ßí =--

Bu$h isn't fooling anyone, and he has doomed Amerika...

The evil root of all instability in the world today
China Daily

Many well-intentioned idealists in America still think the Bushies were
doing a good thing when they invaded Iraq, sacking Saddam's palaces and
murdering his two sons.

These folks don't seem to understand that GW Bush was not truly motivated
by revenge for his dad, nor was he interested in bringing 'democracy' to a
land whose original Sumerian settlers had been fashioning equitable modes
of governance at least six millennia before the Vikings made their first
tentative dart across the North Sea, braving the Labrador Currents to reach
the Hudson Bay in North America.

They refuse to face the fact that it is the neocons' inane dream of world
conquest, propelled by their anachronistic imperialist ideology and their
solidarity with their Zionist cohorts that is at the root of all
instability in the world today.

So how did the neo-cons come to believe that time was ripe for fulfilling
their dream of world conquest?

A combination of factors had led them to embark on the pursuit of this
dream: First, America's political, economic and military dominance in the
post-Cold War era satisfied the pre-requisite conditions for its push in
the fourth phase of its expansion. Second, the dissolution of the Soviet
Bloc whetted their appetite while their zero-casualty exploits in Kosovo
and Yugoslavia put a seal of approval on their fledgling geopolitical
experiment. Third, the rise of China gave these racist Anglos an excuse to
strike preemptively, since they are still cherishing this deep-seated fear
of having to share the good life and limited resources with hordes of non-
whites led by the Chinese, a fear that was highlighted in the recent
breakdown of the Cancun talks over agricultural subsidies. Fourth, the
Jewish desire for controlling water resources and ridding the Palestinians
of financial support from Arabs and Iranians gave their plan the necessary
political impetus on Capitol Hill during the 'smooth' phase of the war.

From Tony Blair's vantage point on the other side of the Atlantic, the main
contention is that in the post-colonial world of Asia, Africa and Latin
America many native peoples are still languishing in economic malaise under
'authoritarian' governments and so these folks must be missing their old
colonial days and simply waiting for the Brits to return.

Otherwise how do you explain the smug confidence of a middle-level
swashbuckling power like Britain attacking an ancient civilization like
Iraq under false pretenses and still getting away with it? If the British
parliament really hate Blair's policies with a vengeance as the hearing
officials on Kelly's murder want the credulous world to believe, they would
have gotten rid of Blair like they had dismissed Chamberlain at the
beginning of WWII.

As it is, the British hearings are sounding more like a cunning facade
providing a cover for Blair's tactical retreat. They have not touched the
core issue which is the return of sovereignty to Iraq through a democratic
election process in which Baath party members are allowed to participate.

Their real attitude can readily be seen in the case of Hongkong when on
July 1 they instigated a huge demonstration through their surrogates
against the anti-subversive Article 23 of the Basic Law, as if to show the
world that Hongkongers would welcome their rule more than that of their own
Chinese brethen in Beijing.

This of course was a disingenuous plot that simply could not have
succeeded.
Hongkong's economic woes are those of a transitional economy re-adjusting
to new economic realities. They have to do with her new role after China's
Gaige Kaifang began to shift into high gear. The resultant inevitable
changes rendered Hongkong's hitherto entreport status dispensable, and have
absolutely nothing to do with China's resumption of sovereignty over the
colony.

That's why the Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) is so important
to the continued prosperity of both the Mainland and the Hongkong SAR. Its
ratification is as much a political counter-punch to the neo-cons in
Washington and neo-colonialists in London as it is an economic lifeline
thrown to the struggling Hongkongers bobbing in the raging currents of
change.

The demise of the Soviet Union thirteen years ago presented before the
Anglo-Jewish cohorts the unique opportunity to test their aura of
invincibility. Certainly not all Americans share this false sense of
vainglorious omnipotence but their voices are effectively muffled in the
face of zero-casualty battlefield successes in the Balkans.
Understandably very few Americans are willing to sacrifice their own
welfare for the wild ambitions of the neo-cons, for inherent in the
latter's plan is the dismantling of social security services and zero
taxation for capital gains of the rich, so much so that all financial
resources could be concentrated in the military-industrial complex to build
absolute dominance in Outer Space. That's why they are so worked up about
the likely successes of Shenzhou manned missions and so miffed about their
implications.

Furthermore, government programs that had ensured social stability since
the days of FDR will be thrown to the wolves and more Americans will be
pushed below the poverty line with no discernible signs of imminent relief.

One only has to note in today's news that the three Anglo governments still
insist that invading Iraq was the right decision to make DESPITE their own
intelligence confirmation that no WMDs have been found after months of
intensive search to realize the commitment the neo-cons have made to their
diabolical scheme. Bush, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and
Australian PM Howard co-ordinated amongst themselves to emphazise their
solidarity on the same day after the CIA pronouncement. Amongst the three
Anglos, Bush's blueblooded lineage can even be traced to English King
Longshank whose cruelty against the Scot rebels was so well portrayed in
the movie "Braveheart" starring Mel Gibson. To the Three Blind Mice,
nothing is more important than to coordinate a race war against China.

These Anglos of course would never openly tell the American people that
their plans for war in March were in fact independent of the existence of
WMD in Iraq. On the contrary, such invasion plans were premised on their
pre-war finding that Iraq did NOT possess WMD. If such weapons had existed,
do you believe American General Tommy Franks would have sent his troops
rapidly across the deserts of southern Iraq and spearheaded them directly
into Baghdad?

Even the blind Mr. Magoo can tell by now -- after all that is said and done
-- that the ultimate target of the neo-cons and neo-colonialists is China.
That is the unspoken cloaked dagger in world diplomatic circles today. The
three must have been able to seal their bond of commitment by mutually
witnessing their shared erectile excitement in the nude privacy of Bush's
Texan sauna room. They must have gleefully congratulated one another over
the occupation of strategic Iraq, and that's why they had continued to
insist today that their invasion plan was 'on target.' In their lexicon,
'target' means China, not Iraq.

But of course they cannot utter those words in their camouflage underwear
outside the sauna room, since they still want to hide their self-induced
excitement while laying down strategic pieces on their China-Encirclement
Chessboard, and they definitely still need China's help in solving irksome
problems popping up from time to time, as in the case of the suddenly-
multiplying-nukes in a place called North Korea.


--
--=( Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí )=----- ----- --- - -
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
--- --- ---=================----------- - -
http://www.mingthemerciless.com/atat.html