![]() |
|
|
|
|
1
8th November 20:57
External User
Posts: 1
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/3082902.stm
Tigers scent historic win Third Test, Multan, day three: Bangladesh 281 & 154; Pakistan 175 & 148-6 (at close) Bangladesh have a first Test win in their sights after running through Pakistan's top order. But the game could still be snatched from their grasp with Inzamam-ul-Haq reaching 53 not out to keep Pakistan's hopes of a 3-0 series whitewash alive. ..... ================================================== ============================== ["..... we let them (Bangladesh) play beyond their ability, but here we would try our best to finish it off early" -- Rashid Latif] http://www.dawn.com/2003/09/03/spt2.htm DAWN, Karachi, Pakistan 03 September 2003 Wednesday 05 Rajab 1424 Rashid slams BD for negative approach MULTAN, Sept 2: Bangladesh came under scathing attack from Pakistan captain Rashid Latif on Tuesday for their negative approach in the first two Tests of the current series. "I was amazed by their (Bangladesh) tactics and if they don't play positively it will get more difficult for them to improve, Rashid told a press conference. "I don't want to sound harsh but if Bangladesh keep on playing with such a negative approach, they will never progress far. At the same time I won't like to interfere in their planning, but they must ensure a positive attitude. I noticed in this series that once their bowlers are hit around they go on the defensive," he added. The Pakistan captain claimed that had the pitches been more favourable for fast bowling, Bangladesh would have not managed to extend the game beyond third day. Yeah, we should we would have finished them inside three days in the first two Tests. "In fact, we let them (Bangladesh) play beyond their ability, but here we would try our best to finish it off early, the Pakistan captain promised. Dav Whatmore, the Bangladesh coach, said his charges needed to avoid losing self-confidence especially after being on top in the first half of both Tests. "I fear for the boys because I am trying to make sure that the boys do not lose confidence. We need to identify and guard those areas where the team has improved immensely", the Australian noted. When asked how he felt after losing the Peshawar Test, Whatmore replied, "Of course, as the coach you are never satisfied. But the manner of team's capitulation hurts me more than anything else. I never expected my team to fold up so meekly in Peshawar", he said. Bangladesh captain Khaled Mahmud was more philosophical about the final Test. "We have shown marked improvement in this series. And hopefully we would like to end the Test series on a high note," he hoped. |
|
|
|
|
2
8th November 20:59
External User
Posts: 1
|
http://www.thedailystar.net/2003/09/06/d3090604.htm
Daily Star, Dhaka, Bangladesh Sat. September 06, 2003 PAKISTAN DIARY Hasan Masood from Multan Pakistan captain Rashid Latif played a trick on Alok Kapali to send him back to the pavilion. Known as one of the most honest cricketers in Pakistan, Latif took a catch off Umar Gul diving to his right but then dropped the ball. However, before either Ashoka de Silva or Russell Tiffin noticed the error, he quickly picked the ball up, which was clearly visible on television. The incident not only invited controversy it also raised a big question on Latif's character because he had been fighting for the truth in Pakistan cricket for a long time. Latif should have called Kapali back knowing he had spilled the catch. |
|
|
3
15th November 05:43
External User
Posts: 1
|
http://jang.com.pk/thenews/sep2003-d.../sports/s8.htm
The News, Karachi, Pakistan Wednesday September 10, 2003-- Rajab 12, 1424 A.H. A pyrrhic victory to put all other pyrrhic victories to shame by Asif Iqbal [Author is former Pakistan and Kent cricket captain] ...... Rashid’s fall, the manner of it, as well as the reaction of our cricketing officialdom to it, brings into focus so much that is wrong with Pakistan - and not just its cricket. Barely 24 hours after Rashid claimed his catch after picking up the ball from the floor he was talking to Rameez Raja during the presentation ceremony, starting his speech with a pious ‘Bismillah Ar-Rahman Ar-Rahim’. His predecessor, who started this trend, had been done for ball-tampering. How can you believe in the values of Islam, the world’s greatest religion, if you cannot bring yourself to be honest on a cricket field? And quite apart from the harm done to the image of Pakistan and Pakistan cricket, just what sort of an image does one give of Islam when on the outside the rituals are ostentatiously observed while on the inside there is nothing even remotely Islamic about the actions. The reaction, both of the board as well as his fellow players, to the incident, is equally baffling. Inzamam, who now leads Pakistan in the one-day series against Bangladesh, is reported to have ‘dedicated’ the one-day series to Latif. It reflects a peculiarly Pakistani concept of loyalty, where if you are one of ‘my men’ you are expected to support me if even if I have been caught with both hands in the till - and the evidence against Rashid showed the feet in the till as well! I am sure that is very praiseworthy, but along with being loyal to one’s colleagues there is the business of loyalty to one’s conscience. If one feels that Rashid was wrong - and one would really have to be blinkered to see otherwise - then one has a duty to one’s conscience as well and this is not one of those situations in which the two loyalties can be said to be on a collision course. Inzamam did not have to dedicate this one-day series against Bangladesh to anyone, not least because victory in it will probably be seen as something less than the ultimate sporting triumph; all he had to do was avoid the subject and he would have been perfectly within his rights to do so. By going out of his way to endorse Rashid he has, albeit perhaps inadvertently, given the message that Rashid’s behaviour was acceptable, which it was not. Even more puzzling is the silence with which the Pakistan Cricket Board has accepted a situation in which the captain of the national side has been done for a level three offence, with many believing he was lucky not to be done for level four which could have meant a life ban. ..... |
|
|
4
15th November 05:43
External User
Posts: 1
|
http://jang.com.pk/thenews/sep2003-d.../sports/s8.htm
The News, Karachi, Pakistan Wednesday September 10, 2003-- Rajab 12, 1424 A.H. A pyrrhic victory to put all other pyrrhic victories to shame by Asif Iqbal [Author is former Pakistan and Kent cricket captain] ...... Rashid's fall, the manner of it, as well as the reaction of our cricketing officialdom to it, brings into focus so much that is wrong with Pakistan - and not just its cricket. Barely 24 hours after Rashid claimed his catch after picking up the ball from the floor he was talking to Rameez Raja during the presentation ceremony, starting his speech with a pious "Bismillah Ar-Rahman Ar-Rahim". His predecessor, who started this trend, had been done for ball-tampering. How can you believe in the values of Islam, the world's greatest religion, if you cannot bring yourself to be honest on a cricket field? And quite apart from the harm done to the image of Pakistan and Pakistan cricket, just what sort of an image does one give of Islam when on the outside the rituals are ostentatiously observed while on the inside there is nothing even remotely Islamic about the actions. The reaction, both of the board as well as his fellow players, to the incident, is equally baffling. Inzamam, who now leads Pakistan in the one-day series against Bangladesh, is reported to have "dedicated" the one-day series to Latif. It reflects a peculiarly Pakistani concept of loyalty, where if you are one of "my men" you are expected to support me if even if I have been caught with both hands in the till - and the evidence against Rashid showed the feet in the till as well! I am sure that is very praiseworthy, but along with being loyal to one's colleagues there is the business of loyalty to one's conscience. If one feels that Rashid was wrong - and one would really have to be blinkered to see otherwise - then one has a duty to one's conscience as well and this is not one of those situations in which the two loyalties can be said to be on a collision course. Inzamam did not have to dedicate this one-day series against Bangladesh to anyone, not least because victory in it will probably be seen as something less than the ultimate sporting triumph; all he had to do was avoid the subject and he would have been perfectly within his rights to do so. By going out of his way to endorse Rashid he has, albeit perhaps inadvertently, given the message that Rashid's behaviour was acceptable, which it was not. Even more puzzling is the silence with which the Pakistan Cricket Board has accepted a situation in which the captain of the national side has been done for a level three offence, with many believing he was lucky not to be done for level four which could have meant a life ban. ..... |
|
| Some other forums that might be of your interest : Culture, Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, United kingdom, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba, Dominican_republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El_salvador, France, Hawaii, India, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Mexican usa, Netherlands, New_zealand, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Puerto_rico, Scotland, South_africa, Spain, Switzerland, Uruguay, Venezuela, Zimbabwe |