![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
30th October 14:55
External User
Posts: 1
|
I am not sure that the banning is not illegal to begin with because
of World Trade Agreements. International Law Specialist...I am not. It just seems like this ban is illegal. (Personally, I think it was ill-advised. I'm not so concerned with France and Germany in regard to this...but O, CANADA?!? O, Pa-leeze!!! They are our good neighbours and have come to our defence and aid many times. Just because we may not always agree on matters....well, I just think the overall picture must be brought into focus.) I also disagree with the Congress getting into the Canadians affording better drug prices to our seniors (and others, for that matter.) If it were not for the VA, my father-in-law would be facing..."Do I eat this week...or buy my meds." There are too many others who are not Vets and ARE faced with those types of questions. Our Vets deserve MUCH better than what they get at the VA...but, I am thankful for that which my father-in- law receives. I just wish it could be better for all Vets...the ones who sacrificed so much for me to be able to live as I do today. -- I bid you love and laughter, but above these...peace. Gena M. Burns-Harrison (GMBH) <>< thewarchest@bellsouth.net "When all the pipers are a-pipin', one stops to listen... but when a lone piper is a-pipin, the whole world stops to listen." |
|
|
8
30th October 14:57
External User
Posts: 1
|
**So what is the translation for "sgrìobh"...
or do I not want to know?** A-W-S: Companies from countries opposed to the conflict in Iraq will be barred from bidding for new rebuilding contracts worth $18.6bn, the Pentagon has said. US Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said the policy was necessary to protect America's "essential security interests". : ) James Linn: And so Canada, which though it refused to participate(under some heavy pressure), after the war was over decided to contribute 300 million in aid for reconstruction(for a country with 1/10 the population of the US). And it sent thousands of troops to Afghanistan, when the army was clearly stretched to its breaking point, to free up US troops. The Canadian Navy had every ship in the fleet in the Persian Gulf over the last 18 months, leading the attempt to stop terrorist and arms smuggling in the area. All this and the US tells its largest trading partner(by far) to go take a hike. MacH M: I agree with you. France, Germany, and Russia I can understand, but excluding Canada from bidding is a major faux pas. James Linn: Pehaps we should cut off the supply of cheap prescriptions to the US, and see what happens. MacH M: There's been talk in the US Congress of making it illegal to purchase prescription drugs from Canada, if they haven't already done so. Effing scallywags!! Respectfully, to A W S and Lachie... Lachie: GMBH: No, it does not strike me as perverse at all. I have intentionally remained silent about the war... but mind you, it may not be for the reasons that you may think. And, I shall continue to remain silent in regard to the war...at least in this forum. I do discuss it elsewhere... but not in NG forum. The troops have my support. That is all I will say about that matter. I was responding merely to the comments regarding the banning of competitive bids from countries who were opposed to the war as being wrong. I still hold that position, and I believe the administration will have to reverse--or at least compromise their most recent statement of banning. Anyway, it will have to be amended one way or the other. And I was speaking regarding the U. S. Congress trying to interfere with Americans buying prescriptions from Canada. gmbh: GMBH: I can assure you that my father-in-law did not have the luxury of an institution of higher learning. He was in the middle of tank wars in WWII as a tank sergeant. Three of those tanks were blown out from under him. He was 19 and 20 years old at the time. He saw many of his buddies blown up right in front of him. He lives with the guilt of having come back from *that* university...when his buddies didn't. "Survivors" University, if you will. He doesn't talk about it though. He does not brag about his *degrees*. Since I am into genealogy and history, I was only too happy to do some research and find out about his war itinerary. He is 79 years old...we just found out *this* year that he had been awarded the Bronze Star. As far as I am concerned, he earned his diploma... and his right to benefits at the VA. The kicker is: he earned many more "credit hours" to such, than what the Vets actually get. My dad has WWII Vet status also. He served overseas as an MP during the reconstruction. He broke his back serving his country and spent 3 months in a body cast. He had to learn to walk again. He used to be 6'3"...he isn't anymore. He exercises his right *NOT* to claim VA benefits, because he has been fortunate to retire as chief engineer from an excellent American company which has excellent benefits. He is entitled...but he feels he would be *in effect* taking it from another Vet who really could use the assistance. NBC Anchorman Tom Brokaw got it right the first time. They ARE members of The Greatest Generation. I stand by my original statements. Without apology. I have added a few. Without apology. -- I bid you love and laughter, but above these...peace. Gena M. Burns-Harrison (GMBH) <>< thewarchest@bellsouth.net "When all the pipers are a-pipin', one stops to listen... but when a lone piper is a-pipin, the whole world stops to listen." |
|