![]() |
|
|
|
|
1
2nd July 08:43
External User
Posts: 1
|
US confused by Iraq's quiet war
(EXCERPT) The battle may be over, but Americans are still dying. Is this the birth of an Islamist resistance or a thieves' rebellion? Jonathan Steele and Michael Howard in Baghdad Friday July 18, 2003 The Guardian As armed attacks on US troops in Iraq increase and the Pentagon announces that the crack troops of its most experienced infantry division will stay in the country "indefinitely", the one certainty about the groups carrying out the assaults is the effect they are having: confusion "We're facing a combination of Ba'athists, fedayeen and ex-intelligence services operating without central control on a loose basis," the US administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, told reporters this week. "None of the people detained by coalition forces for carrying out attacks on US soldiers said they were motivated by religion or money," the former counter-terrorism expert added. "The attacks are conducted by professionals. I have confidence that we shall impose our will on these renegades." John Abizaid, the new head of US central command, called it "a classical guerrilla-type campaign" and said: "I believe there's mid-level Ba'athist, Iraqi intelligence service people, Special Security Organisation people, Special Republican Guard people that have organised at the regional level in cellular structure. It's low-intensity conflict in our doctrinal terms, but it's war, however you describe it." These assertive analyses bear surprisingly little resemblance to the views of other source... http://www.guardian.co.uk/internatio...000367,00.html |
|
|
|
|
|