Mombu the GNU Linux Forum

Mombu the GNU Linux Forum > GNU_Linux > mount cdrom
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
1 5th September 09:46
matata
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom



hi,

Few days ago i went to kernel 2.6.
But I can't access my cdrom anymore.
It is a combo DVD/CD-writer.

I read that the scsi drivers weren't needed for writing anymore so I
didn't compile them in the kernel.

This is my rule in /etc/fstab
none /mnt/cdrom supermount
dev=/dev/cdrom,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso9660,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0


Plz help

Greetz Matata
  Reply With Quote
SPONSORED LINKS BY GOOGLE

 


2 5th September 09:46
sybren stuvel
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom



Matata enlightened us with:

That's right.

What does 'ls /dev/cdroms' tell you? Perhaps you need to load the ide-cd
module?

Sybren
--
The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be a
capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the
safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
  Reply With Quote
3 5th September 09:46
matata
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


$ls /dev/cdroms cdrom0
  Reply With Quote
4 5th September 09:46
sybren stuvel
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


Matata enlightened us with:

Ok, so try mounting it with

# mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom

Sybren
--
The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be a
capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the
safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
  Reply With Quote
SPONSORED LINKS BY GOOGLE

 


5 5th September 14:14
matata
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


mount: /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 is not a valid block device
  Reply With Quote
6 5th September 14:14
sybren stuvel
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


Matata enlightened us with:


And what is the output of 'ls -l /dev/cdroms'?

Sybren
--
The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be a
capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the
safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
  Reply With Quote
7 5th September 14:14
matata
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Oct 26 2003 cdrom0 -> ../scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/cd
  Reply With Quote
8 5th September 14:14
sybren stuvel
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


Matata enlightened us with:

Hmmm.... everything checks out so far. Are you 100% sure the CDROM
contains a mountable disk?

Sybren
--
The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be a
capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the
safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
  Reply With Quote
9 5th September 14:14
johan lindquist
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


So anyway, it was like, 23:57 CEST May 13 2004, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Sybren Stuvel was all like, "Dude,


If I recall correctly, the OP started out saying he'd removed ide-scsi
emulation from the kernel..?

--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
00:17:53 up 5 days, 2:30, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
$ cat /dev/bollocks Registered Linux user #261729
synergize 24/7 portals
  Reply With Quote
10 5th September 18:40
matata
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default mount cdrom


Yes correct, I did not compile the ide-scsi emulation in kernel, because
it is a ide-cdrom

I checked if the cdrom wasn't disconnected, or broken by starting up to
win*** ,it recognised the cdrom...

Greetz
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes







Copyright © 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
Also visit Ogoun the Usenet Archive
666