![]() |
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
|
2
14th June 18:47
External User
Posts: 1
|
In article <5ejj811ahmt24bto5alrnbh417abj112sa@4ax.com>,
barry@bf111.plus.com says... You are embarking on an endless quest with a shockingly steep learning curve. You need a fast computer, way faster than 1GHZ, fast hard drives, one of which should be at least 80GB, 7200 RPM and dedicated to your DVD work. You need a capture card and a sound card and the appropriate software. Probaly the Ahead Software Nero suite of tools is your best bet. It may be bundled with either your capture card or your DVD drive. You do have a DVD drive, do you not? Start reading some of the many bulletin boards, support groups and the like. And don't throw away the tapes after you have made DVDs of them. A few months from now you will know how to do it better and will want to capture those tapes again. |
|
|
4
15th June 20:59
External User
Posts: 1
|
In article <lhpk81ho8ip4c8jldhrba0maaiqr4dndnm@4ax.com>,
barry@bf111.plus.com says... Depends on how good you want the results to be. The major problem in capturing video from tape to DVD is dropped frames during the capture process. This makes for herky-jerky most unpleasant playback with screwed up out of sync audio. I have been getting some pretty good results with the MedioStream capture card and Neovideo software for capture. The program is huge, so it must be doing something. But it is not versatile. You must have an AGP display adapter, a separate sound card and of course the capture card as well as the fast computer and lots od HD space. The software comes bundled with the card. For actually making the DVD, I find Nero mush more versatile but it's not very good at capturing. Even with that setup frames still get dropped. I have been working with a free program called VirtalDub. But this is where you get off the amateur track. VirtualDub allows one to capture in AVI format, which is essentially uncomporessed so you get all the information and because the load on the computer is less get fewer or no dropped frames. Once you have a good clean capture with all the information you can do what you please. The capture will be as good as the original tape and can even be improved somewhat wiuth various filters. Other capture processes use various degrees of compression, which measns information gets thrown away and you end up with the generational problem where each iteration is poorer quality than the last. A DVD will copy to another DVD without any degradation. The copy is exact, unlike tape. But a poor copy just makes another identical poor copy. |
|
|
6
15th June 21:01
External User
Posts: 1
|
In article <1116433550.527919.185800@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
drsmartz@yahoo.com says... Ah, but you are putting a monetary value on what should be a labor of love, a hobby, if you will. And what about those tapes you'd rather your heirs never saw let alone somne clerk at Walmart? Yes, DIY is a HUGE hassle. But then there is the feeling of accomplishment. Just don't throw away the tapes until you are wholly satisfied with your DVD product. I made that mistake. |
|
|
9
16th June 20:15
External User
Posts: 1
|
In article <4tqke.20377$J12.8722@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
not_really@fred_aspect.com says... The problem is that basic NeoStudio or Nero won't capture in AVI. They insist on capturing some compressed format, basically MPEG2. This means that your original video is being stripped of information even as you watch. The result may be OK. But it will be a downgrade from the original VHS. You need to be able to capture in AVI uncompressed or lossless compression, i.e., hufy. That way you get a base file that is 100% of your original. Then you can do what you like with it. But audio synch can be a big problem. |
|