![]() |
|
1
20th September 21:47
External User
Posts: 1
|
Chos TKd www.chos.com is knowingly using their power over the mental
health industry and public officials in positions of public trust by their services of combat arts to the Federal Government, instructing these people to lie pertinent to me so that any and all suspicion on your part is warded off, since you trust the establishments in society that are of health & justice. Or said another way, establishments of public trust are the best way to commit crimes against someone, because they are looked upon as positions and establishments of "trust" or "good wil". The best way to commit evil is under the mask of good. Chos TKD want me back in Wisconsin because Chom Son Cho believes I am the reincarnated founder of his TKD style, and he has objectives of me being in business with his sons, but under their social shape & affiliation of life, not my own. So "breaking me of my spirit" is what Chos and Spielberg have attempted to do, Spielberg also covetting beliefs of reincarnation pertinent to me, but before he gets directly involved with me, he too must have his way with my identity, I must abide to his shaping & defining of me, over my own of my own original choice. Again, breaking me of my spirit to redefine me, by using all the vital elements I need in life "to be". A conspiracy to change me against my wil, by using my living environment and gearing it against me. Using the mental health field is their tool to keep anyone from digging into things and discovering "yes, they have the power by their financial status of being a billionaire as well as combat specialists, by of which they control public positions of public trust and use them to commit evils and crimes against their targets". The URL and the excerpted paragraph shows it's happening quite a bit, not just with me. In fact, just wonder about the power of the mafia being able to use psychiatrists on anyone that would detect their subversion of exploiting the government for personal gain yielding market domination, by completely controlling legislation and politics. They'd be able to direct their puppet psychiatrists to label the person paranoid, or schizophrenic, for detecting their actual conspiracys of power and abuse of power. That is going on. http://psychrights.org/force_of_law.htm#Commitment Corruption in the Courts It turns out that psychiatrists, with the full understanding and tacit permission of the trial judges, regularly lie in court to obtain involuntary commitment and forced medication orders: [C]ourts accept . . . testimonial dishonesty, . . . specifically where witnesses, especially expert witnesses, show a "high propensity to purposely distort their testimony in order to achieve desired ends." . .. . Experts frequently . . . and openly subvert statutory and case law criteria that impose rigorous behavioral standards as predicates for commitment . . . This combination . . . helps define a system in which (1) dishonest testimony is often regularly (and unthinkingly) accepted; (2) statutory and case law standards are frequently subverted; and (3) insurmountable barriers are raised to insure that the allegedly "therapeutically correct" social end is met . . .. In short, the mental disability law system often deprives individuals of liberty disingenuously and upon bases that have no relationship to case law or to statutes. The ADA and Persons with Mental Disabilities: Can Sanist Attitudes Be Undone? by Michael L. Perlin, Journal of Law and Health, 1993/1994, 8 JLHEALTH 15, 33-34. The psychiatric profession explicitly acknowledges psychiatrists regularly lie to the courts in order to obtain forced treatment orders. E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., probably the most prominent proponent of involuntary psychiatric treatment says: It would probably be difficult to find any American Psychiatrist working with the mentally ill who has not, at a minimum, exaggerated the dangerousness of a mentally ill person's behavior to obtain a judicial order for commitment. Torrey, E. Fuller. 1997. Out of the Shadows: Confronting America's Mental Illness Crisis. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 152. Dr. Torrey goes on to say this lying to the courts is a good thing. Dr. Torrey also quotes Psychiatrist Paul Applebaum as saying when "confronted with psychotic persons who might well benefit from treatment, and who would certainly suffer without it, mental health professionals and judges alike were reluctant to comply with the law," noting that in "'the dominance of the commonsense model,' the laws are sometimes simply disregarded." It is also well known that: Traditionally, lawyers assigned to represent state hospital patients have failed miserably in their mission. Competency, Deinstitutionalization, and Homelessness: A Story of Marginalization, Michael L. Perlin, Houston Law Review, 28 Hous. L. Rev. 63 (1991). So, sad to say, in what will no doubt be shocking to most all Americans who have not experienced this process, but is not even surprising to those who are involved with the system, it turns out that the legal protections for people diagnosed as mentally ill are illusory and the court proceedings are fairly characterized as a sham. The effect of this is eloquently described by Professor Perlin: Its toxin infects all participants in the judicial system, breeds cynicism and disrespect for the law, demeans participants, and reinforces shoddy lawyering, blase judging, and, at times, perjurious and/or corrupt testifying. The reality is well known to frequent consumers of judicial services in this area: to mental health advocates and other public defender/legal aid/legal service lawyers assigned to represent patients and criminal defendants who are mentally disabled, to prosecutors and state attorneys assigned to represent hospitals, to judges who regularly hear such cases, to expert and lay witnesses, and, most importantly, to the person with a mental disability involved in the litigation in question. Sanist Attitudes, supra. |
|
|
SPONSORED LINKS BY GOOGLE |
|
SPONSORED LINKS BY GOOGLE |
|
|