Sooo...how do you REALLY feel?
It might not be the worst Metallica album according to some people, but I'd
definitely say it is. EVERY ALBUM had at least one song worth listening to,
while St. Anger does not, IMO. And, the sound quality on St. Anger is horrible.
And here's a story for ya, I fell asleep while listening to St. Anger in the airport
waiting for an international flight. (Yes, I missed the flight.) The songs give me
a very sleepy feeling. I don't know if it's just me or it's that way for everyone.
But that day was the last time I listened to St. Anger.
Also, there are absolutely no guitar solos on St. Anger!
I don't get what they were trying to prove with that. Maybe Kirk... I don't
know how the hell to finish that sentence. I mean wtf could cause Kirk
to not do any solos in the 6 months that they were recording their crap?
James' voice sounds a bit shitty on this album. Not the James from any other
Metallica album at all.
So, if they were trying to do thrashie stuff again, why the **** does James
sing like crap? instead of like their early albums?
Maybe he just didn't put enough effort into it.
There's no cool drumtracks in the album either. The drums can be heard constantly
without any certain rhythym.
I think we have Bob Rock to thank here for his outstanding performance on the bass.
And Lars can always be blamed for anything that goes wrong.
Now, go watch the Some Kind of Monster do***entary/interview video. It seems
that the band loves this album and they all worked on it equally. And evidently, the
band weren't communicating very well with eachother before this album. But St. Anger
was built on friendship and great communication and other nonsense.
I really don't get how they could possibly release such a horrible album.
I'd prefer listening to Load/Reload instead of St. Anger.
Now you give us your opinion.
-fwaggle
|