[shaking my head at the utter foolishness of the moron] The scalp
lymphoma case is a "smoking gun" merely because it helps to demonstrate
the flat out lies Lyall was putting forth. The case was no more
spectacular as far as a cure is concerned than many, many cases Revici
cured.

Why didn't Brenner use the metastatic breast cancer featured in his
book, where at least 11 bones "grew back", with photos of x-rays
verifying the results? Or why didn't Brenner use Dr. Fishbein's, highly
undifferentiated brain tumor case? Or the 18 cases presented back in
1955?

The list could go on and on. Yet the moron has fixated his narrow
vision on a case that would have created a huge amount of defensiveness
among the medical establishment had he presented it.


The lymphoma case is significant merely in that it proves Lyall lied.
It was no more important that many other successes Revici achieved.
Brenner didn't want to piss people off...that wasn't his
personality...he wanted to move the ball forward.

Btw, Brenner became interested due to a patient of his returning to see
him. From there he investigated cases where he could call the
physicians to verify biopsies, etc. It is quite possible that he wasn't
aware of the Lyall debacle, because his interest was in seeing cases
presented to him by Revici.

Revici introduced living patients to him in person...two pancreatic
patients and a malignant brain tumor patient on his first visit, for
instance...that is always more impressive than old paperwork.

The next time you want me to "explain [it] to us again," reread this answer.