villagernumber6

Here are some safety issues that I haven't heard
debated as much as the comfort issues of fat flying.

1)A fat passenger might not fit through the wing exit

2)A fat passenger might congest the evacuation

I think the FAA should require a mix of normal seats
and roomy seats. The roomy seats should be near the
front and rear exits and cost slightly more (proportional
to the additional floor space). Mothers with toddlers,
fat people, people with broken legs, etc. should be required
to buy the roomy seats near the roomy exits.

snnnnnoorrt

They already have roomier seats available, it's called first class. A
company that doesn't have different classes on their planes like Southwest
should not be forced to accommodate disgusting, slovenly, fat, lazy
gluttons. This is why Southwest requires fat people to buy (at least) two
seats. .

I am in favor of BMI tests at the airport, preferably done in full view of
other customers. If you are over a specified limit, you should not be
allowed on the plane as, like you said, you may not fit through the
emergency door. Most fat people are terribly selfish and say that the
airlines (and other entities) should bend over backwards to cater to their
self-indulgance. Of course, other people's safety and the fact they would
have to foot the bill are secondary concerns to them.

Perhaps if fat people learn rejectance first hand at the airport they will
think again about getting on the treadmill.

HTH

S*nort

Top 10 reasons fat people are not accepted:

10. They are slow and slothlike, lumbering towards their destination,
blocking you from yours.
9. The cost society millions of dollars in obesity related diseases.
8. They ruin your dinner out because they are so digusting to look at as
they feed ravenously.
7. They smell like sweat and shit from the inability to reach themselves.
6. They don't bathe nearly as often as normal people.
5. They complain about everything and are generally rude and unpleasant
since they are so miserable.
4. They are always single-minded, looking for their next trough of food.
3. At movie theaters and on airplanes they always selfishly invade your
space.
2. They rarely try to lose weight and prefer to remain gluttonous hogs.
They usually lie about their diets.
1. They get in the way of looking at normal, thin, good-looking people.

frank f. matthews

And will kick your ass out of the way if you don't stay clear.


And save a fortune in retirement benefits.

Your diner was already ruined by your bad taste.


You must be smelling your stale clothes.


You must spend all your time in the tub.

The complaints are only around silly asses like you. Of course that's
where you spend your time.


Projecting your fantasies are you.


It's my space.


Why should they try to frustrate themselves. They could become like you.


What diets?

They get a good look though by standing on fools like you. Trolling is
such fun.

FFM

villagernumber6

Here are some safety issues that I haven't heard
debated as much as the comfort issues of fat flying.

1)A fat passenger might not fit through the wing exit

2)A fat passenger might congest the evacuation

I think the FAA should require a mix of normal seats
and roomy seats. The roomy seats should be near the
front and rear exits and cost slightly more (proportional
to the additional floor space). Mothers with toddlers,
fat people, people with broken legs, etc. should be required
to buy the roomy seats near the roomy exits.

snnnnnoorrt

They already have roomier seats available, it's called first class. A
company that doesn't have different classes on their planes like Southwest
should not be forced to accommodate disgusting, slovenly, fat, lazy
gluttons. This is why Southwest requires fat people to buy (at least) two
seats. .

I am in favor of BMI tests at the airport, preferably done in full view of
other customers. If you are over a specified limit, you should not be
allowed on the plane as, like you said, you may not fit through the
emergency door. Most fat people are terribly selfish and say that the
airlines (and other entities) should bend over backwards to cater to their
self-indulgance. Of course, other people's safety and the fact they would
have to foot the bill are secondary concerns to them.

Perhaps if fat people learn rejectance first hand at the airport they will
think again about getting on the treadmill.

HTH

S*nort

Top 10 reasons fat people are not accepted:

10. They are slow and slothlike, lumbering towards their destination,
blocking you from yours.
9. The cost society millions of dollars in obesity related diseases.
8. They ruin your dinner out because they are so digusting to look at as
they feed ravenously.
7. They smell like sweat and shit from the inability to reach themselves.
6. They don't bathe nearly as often as normal people.
5. They complain about everything and are generally rude and unpleasant
since they are so miserable.
4. They are always single-minded, looking for their next trough of food.
3. At movie theaters and on airplanes they always selfishly invade your
space.
2. They rarely try to lose weight and prefer to remain gluttonous hogs.
They usually lie about their diets.
1. They get in the way of looking at normal, thin, good-looking people.

frank f. matthews

And will kick your ass out of the way if you don't stay clear.


And save a fortune in retirement benefits.

Your diner was already ruined by your bad taste.


You must be smelling your stale clothes.


You must spend all your time in the tub.

The complaints are only around silly asses like you. Of course that's
where you spend your time.


Projecting your fantasies are you.


It's my space.


Why should they try to frustrate themselves. They could become like you.


What diets?

They get a good look though by standing on fools like you. Trolling is
such fun.

FFM

villagernumber6

I'm afraid my original post may have been misunderstood.
I think airlines should be able to safely accommodate a
more realistic cross section of passengers. A 400 lb
passenger is fairly common. Imagine this fat passenger
struggling down the aisle, over the seats and out the
wing exit - oops can't fit - then struggling against
the traffic flow towards a larger exit. Everybody on
that flight is going to be endangered.

Seats are crowded today because of competition.
Ideally the FAA should require all seats to be wider
with more leg room. There should be a few seats that
are roomy enough to comfortably accommodate a 400 lb
passenger near the front or rear exit. In a real
crash there are going to be injured passengers,
fat passengers, people trying to evacuate with their
prized carry-on luggage, etc. The FAA needs to be
more realistic.

villagernumber6

I'm afraid my original post may have been misunderstood.
I think airlines should be able to safely accommodate a
more realistic cross section of passengers. A 400 lb
passenger is fairly common. Imagine this fat passenger
struggling down the aisle, over the seats and out the
wing exit - oops can't fit - then struggling against
the traffic flow towards a larger exit. Everybody on
that flight is going to be endangered.

Seats are crowded today because of competition.
Ideally the FAA should require all seats to be wider
with more leg room. There should be a few seats that
are roomy enough to comfortably accommodate a 400 lb
passenger near the front or rear exit. In a real
crash there are going to be injured passengers,
fat passengers, people trying to evacuate with their
prized carry-on luggage, etc. The FAA needs to be
more realistic.

davispaul64

Oh boy! Get ready for a post from "The Bill Mattocks":-)

davispaul64

Oh boy! Get ready for a post from "The Bill Mattocks":-)