Chelation Therapy: Unproven Claims and Unsound Theories (coronary atherosclerosis angiography)
Sales pitches are a better description. Can you post any study in the past
decade which shows, using appropriate objective medical tests, e.g.
arteriograms, angiography, etc. which show, pre-chlation, that the arteries
are narrowed, and that, post chelation, the arteries are demonstrably more
open? So far, no one has posted one single study showing that.
And, if chelation does not open the arteries, the patient's underlying
disease is not address, and is likely to die or lose a limb.
Not in this case. Imagine being able to provide a non-invasive treatment for
extended periods of time where the doctor, and not the hospital, get the
lion's share of the insurance money? It is in the financial interests of the
doctors to find that chelation is effective for atherosclerosis.
You posted sales hype and symptomatic studies not addressing the underlying
disease process. Treating only the symptoms and not the underlying disease
process can lead to sudden coronary events and death.
If it is shown to actually reduce arterial narrowing and open up the lumina,
then it will receive widespread support.
I do not lie. When you claim that you have caught me in a lie, it is either
because you did not understand what I said, or duisagree with what I said.
You also call opinions lies.
|