|
1
17th March 03:40
External User
|
CIA Got Uranium Reference Cut in Oct. Why Bush Cited It In Jan. (boil grief)
CIA Got Uranium Reference Cut in Oct.
Why Bush Cited It In Jan. Is Unclear
By Walter Pincus and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, July 13, 2003; Page A01
CIA Director George J. Tenet successfully intervened with White House
officials to have a reference to Iraq seeking uranium from Niger removed
from a presidential speech last October, three months before a less
specific reference to the same intelligence appeared in the State of the
Union address, according to senior administration officials.
Tenet argued personally to White House officials, including deputy
national security adviser Stephen Hadley, that the allegation should not
be used because it came from only a single source, according to one
senior official. Another senior official with knowledge of the
intelligence said the CIA had doubts about the accuracy of the documents
underlying the allegation, which months later turned out to be forged.
The new disclosure suggests how eager the White House was in January to
make Iraq's nuclear program a part of its case against Saddam Hussein
even in the face of earlier objections by its own CIA director. It also
appears to raise questions about the administration's explanation of how
the faulty allegations were included in the State of the Union speech.
It is unclear why Tenet failed to intervene in January to prevent the
questionable intelligence from appearing in the president's address to
Congress when Tenet had intervened three months earlier in a much less
symbolic speech. That failure may underlie his action Friday in taking
responsibility for not stepping in again to question the reference. "I
am responsible for the approval process in my agency," he said in
Friday's statement.
As Bush left Africa yesterday to return to Washington from a five-day
trip overshadowed by the intelligence blunder, he was asked whether he
considered the matter over. "I do," he replied. White House press
secretary Ari Fleischer told reporters yesterday that "the president has
moved on. And I think, frankly, much of the country has moved on, as
well."
But it is clear from the new disclosure about Tenet's intervention last
October that the controversy continues to boil, and as new facts emerge
a different picture is being presented than the administration has given
to date.
Details about the alleged attempt by Iraq to buy as much as 500 tons of
uranium oxide were contained in a national intelligence estimate (NIE)
that was concluded in late September 2002. It was that same reference
that the White House wanted to use in Bush's Oct. 7 speech that Tenet
blocked, the sources said. That same intelligence report was the basis
for the 16-word sentence about Iraq attempting to buy uranium in Africa
that was contained in the January State of the Union address that has
drawn recent attention.
Administration sources said White House officials, particularly those in
the office of Vice President Cheney, insisted on including Hussein's
quest for a nuclear weapon as a prominent part of their public case for
war in Iraq. Cheney had made the potential threat of Hussein having a
nuclear weapon a central theme of his August 2002 speeches that began
the public buildup toward war with Baghdad.
In the Oct. 7 Cincinnati speech, the president for the first time
outlined in detail the threat Hussein posed to the United States on the
eve of a congressional vote authorizing war. Bush talked in part about
"evidence" indicating that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear weapons
program. The president listed Hussein's "numerous meetings with Iraqi
nuclear scientists," satellite photographs showing former nuclear
facilities were being rebuilt, and Iraq's attempts to purchase
high-strength aluminum tubes for use in enriching uranium for nuclear
weapons.
There was, however, no mention of Niger or even attempts to purchase
uranium from other African countries, which was contained in the NIE and
also included in a British intelligence dossier that had been published
a month earlier.
By January, when conversations took place with CIA personnel over what
could be in the president's State of the Union speech, White House
officials again sought to use the Niger reference since it still was in
the NIE.
"We followed the NIE and hoped there was more intelligence to support
it," a senior administration official said yesterday. When told there
was nothing new, White House officials backed off, and as a result
"seeking uranium from Niger was never in drafts," he said.
Tenet raised no personal objection to the ultimate inclusion of the
sentence, attributed to Britain, about Iraqi attempts to buy uranium in
Africa. His statement on Friday said he should have. "These 16 words
Bush said in Abuja, Nigeria, yesterday that he continues to have faith
in Tenet. "I do, absolutely," he said. "I've got confidence in George
Tenet; I've got confidence in the men and women who work at the CIA."
There is still much that remains unclear about who specifically wanted
the information inserted in the State of the Union speech, or why
repeated concerns about the allegations were ignored.
"The information was available within the system that should have caught
this kind of big mistake," a former Bush administration official said.
"The question is how the management of the system, and the process that
supported it, allowed this kind of misinformation to be used and
embarrass the president."
Senior Bush aides said they do not believe they have a communication
problem within the White House that prevented them from acting on any of
the misgivings about the information that were being expressed at lower
levels of the government.
"I'm sure there will have to be some retracing of steps, and that's
what's happening," White House communications director Dan Bartlett
said. "The mechanical process, we think is fine. Will more people now
give more, tighter scrutiny going forward? Of course."
A senior administration official said Bush's chief speechwriter, Michael
J. Gerson, does not remember who wrote the line that has wound up
causing the White House so much grief.
Officials said three speechwriters were at the core of the State of the
Union team, and that they worked from evidence against Iraq provided by
the National Security Council. NSC officials dealt with the CIA both in
gathering material for the speech and later in vetting the drafts.
Officials involved in preparing the speech said there was much more
internal debate over the next line of the speech, when Bush said in
reference to Hussein, "Our intelligence sources tell us that he has
attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear
weapons production."
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, in his Feb. 5 presentation to the
United Nations, noted a disagreement about Iraq's intentions for the
tubes, which can be used in centrifuges to enrich uranium. The U.N.'s
International Atomic Energy Agency had raised those questions two weeks
before the State of the Union address, saying Hussein claimed nonnuclear
intentions for the tubes. In March, the IAEA said it found Hussein's
claim credible, and could all but rule out the use of the tubes in a
nuclear program.
Staff writer Dana Milbank contributed to this report from Nigeria.
© 2003 The Washington Post Company
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48847-2003Jul12.html?nav=hptop_tb
http://votetoimpeach.org
|