Mombu the Medicine Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Medicine Forum > Medicine > Fat/Overweight (diabetes apnea diet high blood pressure colon)
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links


Reply
 
1 8th May 21:41
cowboy
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Fat/Overweight (diabetes apnea diet high blood pressure colon)


Ideal-isms
By Sandy Szwarc 08/04/2003


If being overweight is as deadly as we've been told, the evidence should be
irrefutable. It's not.

"The conclusion that obesity is dangerous represents a selective review of
the data," concluded David Garner, Ph.D., and Susan Wooley, Ph.D., in
"Confronting the Failure of Behavioral and Dietary Treatments for Obesity,"
published by Clinical Psychology Review in 1991.

Their comprehensive examination of studies on obesity-related mortalities
and morbidities found repeated design problems, cases where the key
conclusions contradicted the data and summaries that selectively chose
studies supporting the conclusions of the researchers. Challenging the
popular view of obesity-linked mortalities, they said, "a number of
epidemiological studies and reviews have concluded either that obesity does
not confer elevated health risks or that such risks have been greatly
exaggerated."

That's the same conclusion Glenn Gaesser, Ph.D. arrived at after
scrutinizing all the relevant data in his book, Big Fat Lies: The Truth
About Your Weight and Your Health (Fawcett Columbine, 1996).

"Those beliefs [that obesity is dangerous] are so firmly entrenched in our
fat-phobic mindset that they are seldom questioned," Gaesser, an associate


fat, is a meaningful indicator of health, fitness, or prospects for
longevity is ... one of our most dubious propositions."

In their detailed review of epidemiological studies published in 1987 in the
Journal of Obesity and Weight Regulation, researchers Paul Ernsberger,
Ph.D., and Paul Haskew, Ed.D., often found no reliable association between
premature death and relative weight, as measured by the Body Mass Index
(BMI). "Across lifespan, the net impact of BMI is minimal," Ernsberger, an
associate professor of Medicine, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Case Western
Reserve School of Medicine, said.

"The majority of investigations have shown that weighing 20 to 50 pounds
over chart recommendations is associated with little, if any, increased risk
of early death," Dr. Steven Blair, president of the Cooper Institute in
Dallas, said.

Thin Support for Fat Guidelines

Repeated long-term studies and reviews of existing studies in the Journal of
the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Archives of Internal
Medicine have tried in vain to prove overweight a risk factor for premature
death.

In fact, the vast majority of studies find weight to be irrelevant to health
and mortality, or that being overweight or obese actually appears to be
healthier, offering the best prospects for long life. As Gaesser wrote, "The
'definitive proof' that being thinner means living longer turns out to be
dwarfed in comparison to a vast, globe-encircling body of evidence based on
data that has been collected since the 1950s on hundreds of thousands of men
and women of different ages, races, nationalities and ethnicities."

One of the most comprehensive ****yses of the relationship between body
weight and mortality ever published was done by researchers at the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health
Statistics and Cornell University in 1996. Studying data on more than
600,000 men and women for 30 years, they found the lowest mortality for men
was at BMIs 23 to 29, mostly weights considered overweight (by up to 50
pounds!) under current guidelines. They also found the highest mortality in
BMIs under 23, comparable only to those who were the most extremely
overweight. It was riskier to be slim than moderately obese. In women, a
wider range of BMIs was perfectly healthy and mortality rates didn't begin
to rise until BMIs reached 32 and beyond.

Another study on women, led by Kevin Fontaine, Ph.D., of John Hopkins
University, concurred that a broad range of weights were well-tolerated, and
found mortality risks were actually lowest at a BMI around 34.

Given the largest body of scientific evidence suggests we'll live the
longest with some extra meat (or fat) on our bones, and it's actually more
dangerous to be slender, the government's new National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute (NHLBI) Guidelines, defining overweight as being BMIs of 25
to 29.9 and obesity at BMIs of 30 or higher, make little sense. Those
distinctions are controversial because they imply health risks which aren't
supported by research, according to Frances Berg, M.S., editor-in-chief of
Healthy Weight Journal.

Being fat isn't unhealthy?

Fat has been blamed for just about every health problem imaginable. The
evidence indicates those few of us at the most extreme end of obesity do
begin to see greater health risks, but those risks do not translate to the
majority of us who are overweight to moderately obese. "What evidence exists
for an association between obesity and mortality or morbidity, is usually
found not to apply to those with mild to moderate obesity," Garner and
Wooley said.

Although we're told that weighing anything over "ideal" is unhealthy,
overweight has "never been tied to objective assessments of body fat as a
causal factor in either higher disease or higher mortality rates," said
Gaesser. There is no association between being overweight and rates of
diabetes, gallstones, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, colon cancer,
heart disease, stroke, and other health problems.

That's goes against everything that's been drilled into us for decades.
Since heart disease is the biggest killer, let's look at its evidence in
more detail.

A 1989 JAMA review of almost 100 studies found fatness is not a risk factor
for atherosclerosis or coronary heart disease. Also, although rarely
mentioned, when cardiovascular health risks are found, they also don't
necessarily translate into higher mortality rates.

Ancel Keys, Ph.D., researcher of 16 long-term studies in seven countries,
concluded about them: "[i]n none ... was overweight or obesity a major risk
factor for death or the incidence of coronary heart disease." And in actual
autopsy ****yses of coronary arteries by 23 medical experts in the
large-scale, 14-country, International Atherosclerosis Project during the
1950s and 1960s, no link was found between body weight or body fat and
vessel disease. Five decades of subsequent autopsy studies have also
concluded obesity does not cause heart disease.

Plumpness not merely benign, but good

Good news about fatness is almost never uttered, as if it might excuse what
our thin-obsessed culture views as objectionable. But there's actually a
considerable amount of positive findings. In addition to longer life spans,
fat people have lower rates of most cancers, respiratory diseases, and
osteoporosis.

Cancers are where the benefits are especially notable, according to Gaesser,
who has counted about 40 studies in the past 30 years indicating lower
cancer rates and mortality among fat people. According to the National
Research Council, obesity appears to protect against overall cancer deaths
and against deaths from the specific cancers that are the leading causes of
cancer death, such as premenopausal breast, lung, stomach and colon cancer
in women, and lung and stomach cancer in men.

"Moderate obesity may also be protective during illness," Ernsberger added.
"You are much more likely to survive a hospitalization if you are over ideal
weight."

The strongest scientific evidence indicates we'll live longest and with the
fewest health problems if we're in the overweight range, especially as we
get older. Older people who are average or moderately overweight have four
times less risk of dying prematurely than those who are underweight or lose
weight. The 1998 Panel Study of Income Dynamics found the lowest health
risks among mature women were at much higher BMIs than current guidelines,
so women might be best advised to welcome middle-aged spread.

Gaining weight is natural as we age. The 1994 Mayo Foundation for Medical
Education and Research study found men and women to be 15 and 19.5 percent
fat respectively at 18 years of age, but 25 and 32 percent by age 56. With
age, fat cells become less metabolically active, so weight gain can be
healthy, Wayne Callaway, M.D., of George Washington University, said.

Reubin Andres, M.D., a gerontologist at the National Institute on Aging and
a professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins, found that the fewest deaths
occurred in those whose weights increased as they aged. "It's acceptable,
possibly even highly beneficial, for normal, healthy adults to gain
gradually about a pound a year beginning around age 40, so that by the time
they're in their 60s they weigh about 20 pounds more than the Met Life
tables would suggest," he said in Food & Nutrition Digest (Extension Foods
and Nutrition, Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University,
March/April 1995).

What's your ideal weight?

Weights deemed "ideal" set body fat standards at 15 percent for men and 22
percent for women, which excludes 75 to 90 percent of American adults,
Gaesser noted. Yet the total body of research shows no clear picture of
what's an ideal weight, he said: "Ideal for one isn't the same for another.
Obesity can be a natural and normal state for some, not a disease."

"Let's face biological reality," Dr. Blair said. "Some people are naturally
meant to be thin, some naturally meant to be fat. ... I don't like the term
'ideal weight.' I don't think we know what any person's ideal weight is.
Human beings come in different sizes and shapes. On any characteristic you
care to name, there's tremendous variation, from eye color to hair color,
for those who have hair and those who don't have hair, and we vary. Some of
us are short and stocky. Some are tall and skinny. So to claim that some
formula can produce a so-called 'ideal weight' that we can then apply to an
individual I think is faulty logic."

Ideal weight is not a medical standard, but a societal preference. Our
cultural "ideal" weight continues to shrink, unrelated to healthfulness.
"It's possible to be healthy at any size," concurred Phillip Walker, M.S.,
director of Walker Wellness Clinic in Dallas.

In fact, "you can be obese and quite healthy," believes Rudolph Leibel,
M.D., director of the division of molecular genetics at Columbia University
College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Your healthiest weight might not be what's considered "ideal" at all, said
Carol A. Johnson, M.A., president of Largely Positive and author of Self
Esteem Comes in All Sizes (Gurze Books, 2001). Plenty of women want to diet
to meet societal ideals, when they're already at the healthiest weight for
their bodies.

Like many clinicians, Frances Berg, M.S., defines a healthy weight as the
weight the body naturally adopts when eating well and living actively.
You're healthy in terms of blood pressure, heart disease measurements,
glucose tolerance, etc. A healthy weight is different for each of us and our
bodies resist trying to force them into something radically different from
their set point.

Forget dieting to reach some goal weight

For overweight people in good health, there's no scientific evidence to show
that they'll be better off if they lose weight, according to Gaesser.

Just because someone looks fat, doesn't mean they're not healthy. In a 2001
issue of Metabolism, obesity expert Ethan Sims, M.D., emeritus professor at
medicine at the University of Vermont, noted that it's important to
identify the healthy subgroup "to avoid blame and inappropriate treatments,
[and] in research to avoid confounding statistical ****ysis."

Weight loss may be indicated, according to the NIH, for those severely
overweight or obese people experiencing "health problems that can be
lessened by weight loss such as sleep apnea, hypertension and type II
diabetes." Even that is controversial, though, and many believe there are
healthier ways to overcome most "weight-related" health problems.

If dieting is chosen, there is abundant clinical research to show that
there's no benefit in trying to achieve "ideal" body weights. Slowly losing
as little as 5 percent body weight reduces or eliminates disorders
associated with obesity, according to many experts, including George
Blackburn, M.D., Ph.D., of the Center for the Study of Nutrition and
Medicine at Harvard Medical School. For example, at-risk people can reduce
their risk of diabetes by 58 percent, Ernsberger said.

"Actually, very little weight loss is necessary to resolve weight-associated
health problems," Gaesser points out. "You'll see 90 percent of health
benefits in the first 5 pounds; problem is most people want to lose weight
to look better not be healthier."

On Wednesday: We'll discover the secret to being healthy and the most
powerful predictor of an early death.

2003 Sandy Szwarc. All rights reserved.

--
For this and many more articles, see Paul Jones' website at
http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


2 13th May 16:36
john
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Fat/Overweight (down)


The fast food business is no different to the tobacco lot.........they would
say anything to
prevent their business going down the tubes.

be
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


3 15th May 00:20
fred
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Fat/Overweight


I would rather have someone overweight/obese/whatever sitting next to me
eating a greasy cheeseburger than a skinny person sitting across the room
smoking. At least the person eating the cheeseburger affects only
themselves. The person should not be eating the cheeseburger. They know
that. It is none of our/anyone's/the person selling the cheeseburger's
business. If cigarettes only affected the user instead of anyone that could
smell them, then I wouldn't have any problem with them at all. Everyone has
the right to do something stupid with their bodies for any reason and at
anyone's profit.

Fred.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




Copyright 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
666