![]() |
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
|
174
2nd April 15:50
External User
Posts: 1
|
Judging from what I have contributed to Medicare, and since
there is no limit on the income taxed for it, he has probably paid more into the fund than most of those complaining about greed ever will, including their copayments. In the presence of an income tax, and in most states a property tax. there should never be another means test; this is an additional income tax, and should be recognized as such, or an additional property tax. The present means tests amount to close to a 100% income tax on those now receiving welfare, until they get off, and a high property tax as well. Replace all welfare with negative income tax, and there will be much more of an incentive for those on welfare to improve. -- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558 |
|
|
175
2nd April 15:50
External User
Posts: 1
|
Why should we have "health insurance" as it now is? What
would your automobile insurance premium be if routine maintenance was covered by it, even with copayments? We should have MSAs and "major medical" coverage, with money put into MSAs fully not taxed, as business health insurance payments are now, but not personal ones. Back in the "old days", all medical payments were deductible from income for income tax purposes, without the rather large present exemption. Of course, then we did not have the phony standard deduction; you itemized if you paid income taxes, and until WWII, most did not. With the current tax laws, if you buy $1000 of insurance, the amount of income you earn to cover this is about $1700, because of taxes. Put in MSAs, which can cover any medical expenses including insurance, and we get back to the lower figure. You could use MSA money without the overhead of paying insurance company profits and the clerical costs involved, and I can see no reason, other than HMOs, etc., putting in cut rates to use their facilities, for anything else other than major medical insurance. Medical costs are likely to drop by 20%. -- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558 |
|
|