kathleen.dickson

Thanks, I am leaving this title, hopefully to get everyone's attention

Subject:
[scilyme] MEDIA CONTACTS--- Re: the "Lyme is RICO" issue
Date:
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:39:24 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From:
jan <janmusinski@earthlink.net>
Reply-To:
scilyme@yahoogroups.com
To:
jan <janmusinski@earthlink.net>, jan
<janmusinski@earthlink.net>, jan <janmusinski@earthlink.net>, jan
<janmusinski@earthlink.net>,
jan <janmusinski@earthlink.net>, SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com, jan
<janmusinski@earthlink.net>, Elliot@afrri.usuhs.mil,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com,
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov, webmaster@usdoj.gov,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com, jan <janmusinski@earthlink.net>,
scilyme@yahoogroups.com,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com, SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com,
scilyme@yahoogroups.com, mbenjamin@upi.com, askjj@ncjrs.org,
execsec1@od.nih.gov,
nimhinfo@nih.gov, apa@psych.org, lou@cnn.com,
mark.oliver@guardian.co.uk, loudobbs@cnn.com,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com,
scilyme@yahoogroups.com, SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com,
howef@parliament.uk, oaks@mindfreedom.com, ask@icspp.org,
spinlyme@yahoogroups.com,
scilyme@yahoogroups.com, gjepsen@ctdems.org,
lobrien@ctdems.org, ray.sirry@po.state.ct.us,
commissioner.dcf@po.state.ct.us,
karen.andersson@po.state.ct.us, francam@ucia.gov,
mstone@law.uconn.edu, FalNields@aol.com, sdonta@adelphia.net,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us,
elizabeth.duarte@po.state.ct.us, thomas.kirk@po.state.ct.us,
rhonda.kincaid@po.state.ct.us, oca@po.state.ct.us,
sarah.gibson@po.state.ct.us,
kathleen.harkins@po.state.ct.us, letters.monitor@apa.org,
letters@washpost.com, jessica.gauvin@po.state.ct.us,
paula.ferrara@mail.house.gov,
attorney.general@po.state.ct.us, thomas.ryn@po.state.ct.us,
modelt1918@aol.com, jettyhound@juno.com, james.phillips@yale.edu,
benjamin.bunney@yale.edu,
pekah.wallace@po.state.ct.us
CC:
diana.urban@po.state.ct.us, katheen.boulware@po.state.ct.us,
pfh1016@aol.com


I'm answering to the new activists to the group, as regards our
failures to
get this FRAUD published. It's hard to believe that we can't get this
published
and that we TRIED everything and everybody, already.

The concept is not convincing, but I will try again. LOOK AT THE
PICTURES.

Look at these plates, Figs 4 and 5:
http://alpha1.mpk.med.uni-muenchen.de/bak/nrz-borrelia/miq-lyme/Frame-MiQ-microbiological53.html
(and nevermind the rest of their nonsense).

If you look at the two sets of Western Blots on the left
(NEUROBORRELIOSIS)
and compare to the one on the right (ACRODERMATITIS, but also
ARTHRITIS)
and then you see the bar graphs in Fig 5, you get the idea.

"Lyme disease" is the thing with the very high antibody response.

THAT is the CDC criteria, the acrodermatitis and arthritis. Us'n
Munchausers
and hypochondriacs have that thing on the left.

Now it is THIS simple:

The CDC has a two-tireed criteria. If you test out at the
high antibody concentration of the arthritis/acrodermatitis
responders,
You Are Welcome to a Western Blot. If not, you fail and are not
entitled to this more sensitive assay, the Western Blot. In fact,
many
insurance companies won't even pay for a blot, unless you pass an
ELISA test first. I am sure that was the intention of this two-tiered
system, since it was probably invented by the ALDF.com dot COM, I
remind you, not dot ORG.

But anyone in a brain in their heads, would say, Wouldn't you simply
want to detect specific antibodies? , particularly OspA, which got the
assignment of "A" for the obvious reason? (If you have antibodies to
OspA or OspB only, you don't officially have Lyme disease, but that
was
the vaccine antigen--- I will repeat, Specific enough to PREVENT Lyme
disease, but not Specific enough to DETECT--- This clearly makes ZERO
sense, but that is the CDC's standard...) It is RICO.


How can the ELISA and the Western Blot Criteria be more sensitive than
just going with a Western Blot as the Crooks claim? It isn't.

Can we make the Western Blot even MORE sensitive? Schutzer and Coyle
and Lenny Sigal went so far as to developing tests for "seronegative"
Lyme,
by detecting even UNDETECTABLE antibodies (complexed).

And that test is 13 years old. Do we use it? No. Of course not, this
is
AMERICA.


I hope that's clear why this is bogus. The ELISA cutoff is HIGH,
rather
than Low, and is the most ridiculous concept ever schemed.

But that's the CDC's criteria. It misses most cases of a borreliosis
infection. And THAT was how they falsely qualified the Lyme vaccines.

They simply INTENDED to throw out data they did not like, that is,
MANAGED CARE wanted to throw out Lyme that wasn't undeniable,
the ARTHRITIS and facial palsy, and not pay for treatment.

We have TRIED to get this published, in ALL the major media.

And this will never go anywhere, clearly, because the media is not
competent to the SCIENCE (although the TIMES SHOULD be, since
they have always had Science Tuesday), so the only answer was
RICO. They obviously have chemists at the US Department of Justice
and the FBI. The FBI even has a brand new lab.

As I said, there are several other markers of illness beside
antibodies, and most of these were discovered by the very
people named in the RICO case.

Even Mark Klempner. who first studied Matrix-Metalloproteinases
in the cerebrospinal fluid, to see if that was the reason for the
neurocognitive
effects, .... and then he recently publish that there ARE not
neurocognitive
effects. (He is an employee of LifeSpan.)

Right. That's why he in the first place made the criteria for his
long term treatment study to be cognitive assessment, and then
showed up at this conference:

http://www.actionlyme.com/2001_RARE_DISEASES.htm

The National Institutes of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke.

Not the National Institutes of Proctology, which would be where he
legitimately needs to be these days, being now an expert...

And this correlated immune type, with seronegative Lyme, is also a
marker
of Lupus, Narcolepsy and Multiple Sclerosis...
http://www.actionlyme.com/Klempner_DQB1_0602.html

....that he discovered with his 5 million dollar grant, but did not
reveal to
the public.

======
There's nothing unusual here, you can verify that what I am saying
is the correct science with any expert or check Medline yourself.

I don't know what significance these Lyme and MS associated haplotypes
have. I suspect simply "immune incompetence", and you can cross
verify yourselves on MedLine. It certainly is not *only* that, as
regards
"seronegative" Lyme, since there are other systems coordinating like
co-infections, and Borreliosis suppresses the immune response anyway,
and that is an identified mechanism also (IL-10).


HOWEVER, considering the NONSENSE that has gone on all these
years, with Lyme, how can we be dumb enough to let Medicine
continue to be "Managed" in this way.

I hope it's clear now. I'm out of ****ogies, Borrelioses are only
about
5% detectable, on purpose. There's no controversy, there are adequate
tests, plenty of them. Lyme disease most certainly kills people if
maybe
1/2 the ALS patients have a borreliosis, and that is not my data.
It kills babies, it kills kids, it kills lots of people. They just
don't know
they had a borrreliosis, because they did not have arthritis.

Arthritis from a spirochete is unusual. Spirochetes are neurotropic.
And that's not my data.

Rev Infect Dis. 1989 Sep-Oct;11 Suppl 6:S1482-6.
Neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease, the new "great imitator".
Pachner AR.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Georgetown University
Medical School, Washington, D.C. 20007.

"The causative agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, is a
highly neurotropic organism that not only can produce
symptomatic neurologic disease but also can exist dormant within the
central nervous system (CNS) for long periods."

Uh-Duh,
The 1989 Infectious Disease Reviews, which the Crooks can't
unpublish, nor take out of the hands of the USDOJ.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2682960&dopt=Abstract

Compare to Klempner and UCONN:

Neurology. 2003 Jun 24;60(12):1916-22.
Cognitive function in post-treatment Lyme disease Do additional
antibiotics help?
Kaplan RF, Trevino RP, Johnson GM, Levy L, Dornbush R, Hu LT, Evans J,
Weinstein A, Schmid CH, Klempner MS.
University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington (Dr. Kaplan).

"CONCLUSION: : Patients with post-treatment chronic Lyme disease who
have symptoms
but show no evidence of persisting Borrelia infection do not show
objective evidence of cognitive impairment."


Generalized to all borrelioses, is what he meant to
imply. You can see how this supports, "You're CRAZY
to say you have such a disease..."

And how does he do the "No evidence of Borrelia..." ?
Simple.
Primers Roullette. Select uncommon DNA and shorten the primers,...

....but Pachner also said, these Osps undergo rearrangement in vivo.
You know, a long time ago, before Medicine was "Managed".

Imagine the burden of Disability that the SSA can hand back to
the Insurance Companies. CFIDS, FM, misdiagnosed Psych Disorders,
New epidemics of Behavioral Disorders in Young Children in CT...
http://www.actionlyme.com/duhDCF.htm

Now, John G. Rowland would not approve, because then the Feds
won't pay he and his TREA friends, and he and his Ins Co friends wil
have to PAY instead.

http://www.actionlyme.com/rowland_to_pay.htm

Kathleen

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US &
Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/asSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Community email addresses:
Post message: scilyme@onelist.com
Subscribe: scilyme-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: scilyme-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: scilyme-owner@onelist.com

Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/scilyme

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/