I fully agree with all your comments. My old audiologist retired and
closed up shop, which fact I belatedly discovered last week when I tried
to contact him after I lost my HA

Soooo, that's why I had to shop for a
new audiologist, and at the same time I was facing this need for a
reasonably quick decision on a replacement aid.
Your ****ogy of technology advances in the manufacturing of consumer
electronics has a bit of truth in HA industry as well I'm sure. However I
think from what I've read, that the cost to manufacture the HA itself is
only a very small percentage of the total costs we see.
As you note, the audi's time for evaluation, fitting, followup, as well as
their fixed costs to operate, and a reasonable profit return, makes up a
far greater portion of the total cost to the consumer than the hardware
component itself. And of course the potential for returns before the trial
period is over also has to account for some built-in overhead allowance.
Nevertheless, one does find that there are differences in pricing, there
are manufacturer sponsored "sales events", and there are a few emerging
service models that differ in approach, with a fixed cost for the
audiology professional and a separate pricing for the device.
Looks like I will be doing a trial of the Magnatone, hopefully it will
work for me. Time was kinda short for making a decision, and worst case is
that before the 30 days are up, if it can't be made to work well with my
particular loss, then I can move to some other HA.
If it doesn't work, it's gonna be tough though, because the price for
other choices is at best several 100's higher, and at worst waaaaay beyond
those numbers, moving into that territory which I can't possibly buy into.
That is why I was hoping for some reasoned discussion of the Magnatone,
the Lori, and some of the other sub-2000 CICs.
Thanks for your participation in this
--
mr.noway