bc726

JCT: Yesterday, I served 4 housekeeping motions on the
Crown but only managed go get three filed. Our appeals are
against Chapnik J. for having set aside Pitt, Lederman J.
for having not given Parker access, Charbonneau J. for not
having declared the prohibition unknown at law, and Aitken
J. for not having quashed the Turmel possess to traffick
charge.

Except for the Lederman appeal which was started by Alan
Young in civil court, the others are all criminal matters
and got filed free. Unfortunately, the last one, the
Lederman motion, didn't filed filed for free. They wanted
$110 we couldn't spare so we're just going to have to hand
it up to the judge and hope the Crown are as anxious as we
are to get the details settled and they let us dispense with
the "motion" filing fee. Boy, would things be easier if I
wasn't such a pauper.

CHAPNIK MOTION
Docket: C38113 (M28512)
Superior Court No. 02-CV-226629CM1
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
BETWEEN
Terrance Parker
The Appellant
AND
Her Majesty the Queen
The Respondent
-------------------------
NOTICE OF MOTION
(Returnable July 10 2003)
-------------------------

TAKE NOTICE that the Appellant Terry Parker will make a
(short notice, if applicable) motion to a judge on July 10
2003 at 10:00am at Osgoode Hall for:
1) an order dispensing with Appellant's Certificate of
Perfection;
2) a direction that Appellant's appeal of Chapnik J. precede
the Appellant's appeal of Lederman J.

THE GROUNDS are that the perfection fees for the Appellants
3 appeals would prove a hardship and that chronological
order would be best suited to the presentation of both
related appeals.

AND FOR any Order abridging the time for service, filing, or
hearing of the motion, any Order amending any defect as to
form or content of the motion or any Order deemed just.

THE DO***ENTARY EVIDENCE is any material this Honorable
Court may permit.
Dated at Toronto: Jul 7 2003
For the Appellant: Terrance Parker
======

CHARBONNEAU MOTION
Court File No: C39653
Superior Court No. 133-2003
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
Between:
TERRANCE PARKER & JOHN TURMEL & MARC PAQUETTE
Applicants
Appellants
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Respondent
------------------------
NOTICE OF MOTION
(Returnable July 10 2003)
------------------------

TAKE NOTICE that the Appellants will make a (short notice,
if applicable) motion to a judge on July 10 2003 at 10:00am
at Osgoode Hall for:

1) an Order extending the time for the serving and filing of
Appellant's Appeal Book and Factum;

2) an Order dispensing with the Appellants' Certificate of
Perfection;

THE GROUNDS are that Appellants' resources are insufficient
to have met the previous date and that the perfection fees
would prove a hardship on Appellants.

AND FOR any Order abridging the time for service, filing, or
hearing of the motion, any Order amending any defect as to
form or content of the motion or any Order deemed just.

THE DO***ENTARY EVIDENCE is any material this Honorable
Court may permit.
Dated at Toronto: Jul 7 2003
Appellant, Agent for the Appellants
=======

AITKEN MOTION
Appeal File No: C40127
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
Between:
John C. Turmel
Appellant/Accused
and
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent/Plaintiff
----------------
NOTICE OF MOTION
(Returnable July 10 2003)
------------------------

TAKE NOTICE that the Appellant John Turmel will make a
(short notice, if applicable) motion to a judge on July 10
2003 at 10:00am at Osgoode Hall for

1) an Order extending the time for service and filing of the
Appellant's Appeal Book and Factum on the grounds that
knowing the Respondent's response to the Lederman decision
on July 9 2003 is of sufficient import to warrant the slight
delay that should not prejudice any of the parties nor
inconvenience the court.

2) a direction that the hearing of this appeal be heard
after the appeal of Appellant's appeal in C39653 on the
grounds that C39653 is related to the previous appeal in
J.P. and C40127 is not.
AND FOR any Order abridging the time for service, filing, or
hearing of the motion, any Order amending any defect as to
form or content of the motion or any Order deemed just.
THE DO***ENTARY EVIDENCE is any material this Honorable
Court may permit.
For the Appellant:

JCT: This was a pleasant surprise. Since it is a matter
dealing with an ongoing criminal charge, and I'm a self-
represented defendant, Chris says they noted that it was
their responsibility to prepare my appeal book and they had
had that done yesterday when Terry and I attended their
offices to serve our paperwork. One less chore for me, only
my simply factum left.
======

LEDERMAN MOTION

JCT: This is the only motion that didn't get filed and
should be dealt with when we hand it up on Thursday.

No: C39738
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
Between:
TERRANCE PARKER
Applicant
Appellant and Respondent in Cross-Appeal
- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Cross-Appellant and Respondent in appeal
No: C39532
And between:
WARREN HITZIG, ALISON MYRDEN, MARY-LYNNE CHAMNEY,
CATHERINE DEVRIES, JARI DVORAK, STEPHEN VAN DE KEMP,
DEBORAH ANNE STULTZGIFFIN & MARCO RENDA
Applicants
Cross-Appellants and Respondents in appeal

- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Appellant and Respondent in cross-appeal
No: C39740
And between:
JOHN C. TURMEL AND J.J. MARC PAQUETTE
Applicants
Appellants and Respondents in Cross-Appeal

and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Respondent
Cross-appellant and Respondent in appeal
--------------------------
NOTICE OF MOTION
(Returnable July 10 2003)
--------------------------

TAKE NOTICE that the Appellants will make a (short notice,
if applicable) motion to a judge on July 2003 at 10:00am
at Osgoode Hall for:

1) an Order dispensing with the Appellants' Certificates of
Perfection;

JCT: When we got back, we learned online:


EP: Marc's factum and certificate of perfection has been
filed and the Filing fee of $175.00 in file no C-39740 paid
re Turmel-Parker-Paquette, Terry I expected to see you there
today at he Registrar's but you never passed by. Whats up.

JCT: So now that Ed has filed my Turmel-Paquette C39740
Certificate of perfection and paid the $175, I guess I'll
have to drop our request to dispense with our fee and only
talk about Terry's $175 fee. I don't know how I feel about
Ed filing my Certificate of Perfection. I wonder how he got
my signature? Back to the unfiled motion:

2) a direction that Appellant Parker's appeal of Chapnik J.
precede the Appellant's appeal of Lederman J.

3) a direction that the Appeal on Access between Parker,
Turmel-Paquette and the Crown be dealt with first before the
Cross-Appeal on Supply between the Crown and the Hitzig
Applicants.

4) a direction permitting John Turmel, who has been
permitted to speak for me before, to make part of my
presentation common to both our cases;

5) a direction that Applicants will continue to be permitted
to unobtrusively tape the proceedings for the purposes of
accurate personal notes;

6) a direction permitting that the national media be
permitted to broadcast the proceedings;

7) E-factums for parties too.

THE GROUNDS are that:

1) the perfection fees for the Appellants appeals would
prove a hardship;

2) that chronological order would be best suited to the
presentation of both related appeals;

3) the appeal should precede the cross-appeal;

4) John Turmel has engineered all the Parker Turmel Paquette
appeals and can make the best presentation of the cases;

5) the larger premises will mandate some setting up and a
small hand-held tape-recorder may prove insufficient to the
task;

6) these five appeals of national importance and merit being
made available to Canadians via their news media.

7) It's the new millennium.

AND FOR any Order abridging the time for service, filing, or
hearing of the motion, any Order amending any defect as to
form or content of the motion or any Order deemed just.

THE DO***ENTARY EVIDENCE is any material this Honorable
Court may permit.
Dated at Toronto: Jul 7 2003
Appellant, Agent for the Appellants

JCT: So those are the housekeeping motions, so far, for
Thursday morning. Of course, a lot depends on what Health
Minister Anne McLellan does to comply with the Lederman
Order by Wednesday. Thursday's hearing should be quite an
eye opener with a possible whole bunch of new moves
available.

Finally, Health Minister McLellan is being advised to attend
the big July 9 2003 demonstration on Parliament Hill to
announce that the PPS medpot will be shipped to Canada's
exemptees. That way, the assembled exemptees on Parliament
Hill can acclaim her compassion in the ideal setting for her
to prove that the Government's is going to obey the Order of
Lederman J. to make the MMAR compliant with the the R. v.
Parker [2000] decision. No doubt.

Waiting for the big demo would also justify her making the
announcement at the very last minute after having exhausted
all other avenues to avoid exercising that compassion!

It could sure be a great day for Canada's exemptees to find
out that their supply problems are over even if it may prove
not a great day for the rest of Canada to find out that they
say it means that they saved the prohibition in the CDSA.

Incredible, isn't it? McLellan on Parliament Hill taking
bows to the acclamations of Canada's exemptees for her
compassionate stance.


--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 613-562-0669 USENET: can.politics