Mombu the Medicine Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Medicine Forum > Medicine > Viagra vs. Cialis: My observations (stomach)
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links


Reply
 
1 1st April 19:13
comparisonshopper
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Viagra vs. Cialis: My observations (stomach)



So I got some Cialis from Liquid Research (I also ordered from China, but those
pills still haven't come, almost four weeks hence...). Too 3 days from order to
arrival for the LR stuff, very good response.

I'm 44, good health. Without drugs able to get erections, but difficulty
maintaining them for long periods of time. (Basically *** is get hard, get in,
then vascilate between soft and somewhat hard once in).

OK, background: Viagra works GREAT for me. Under the best cir***stances
(relatively empty stomach), I get rock hard when stimulated and get major
effect from Viagra for about 2-3 hours, and some effect for around 8 hours.
When I take Viagra, I can tell it's working, because I get a bit of a warm
feeling and my nose gets stuffed. On a really good day, I have even had
spontaneous erections, which I've not had in a long time. V also makes me
somewhat an******ic, though not to a problematic level.

Cialis: I took it and...there were no outward signs it was working. No
stuffiness, no odd body feelings, no spontaneous erections. Hmmm...is
it working? Well, yes. But unlike Viagra, which has side effects that
announce it's doing its stuff, Cialis works more quietly. I could get
and maintain hard erections...but they seemed a bit more organic than those
with Viagra. I didn't note any an******ia. After 24 hours, it seemed to
still be working at 100%. At 36 hours, it seemed to still be working, but
not quite at the same level. A 40 hours, I would say there is still some
effect...probably at around the same level as Viagra at 8 hours for me.

Overall, the effect of Cialis is nice. There is not quite the impervious
'I am a ***ual Superman' feeling you get for about an hour or two with Viagra,
but I think the results are certainly good enough to please you and your
partner. And the ability to take it a long time in advance is a big plus.

The liquid formula (which is only a SUSPENSION, so be sure you shake VERY
WELL any time you use it) is fine. I actually would rather have pills, since
you can take those with you on a long weekend without any problem. A bottle
of stuff doesn't fit in your pocket wrapped in tinfoil nearly as well... :-)

I can imagine taking Cialis every 36 hours to maintain an active *** life.
I hope long term clinicial studies don't dissuade me of the safety of that
approach!


CA
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


2 1st April 19:13
al
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Viagra vs. Cialis: My observations (erection)



My experience:

Took Viagra when it first came out and it worked like gangbusters
(superman?). Its strength diminished over a period of months and after
less than a year I developed an******ia, big time and that was very
frustrating. I also tried **** rings and they are still very useful to
me. I was part of Uprima trials and was very disappointed with it and no
surprise that it has not emerged as a competitive drug for ED. After
Viagra I successfully tried Trimix injections and that had had a
tremendous effect although it has diminished slightly in that I require
a larger dose now than before and it is not as quite long lastingor
produces as hard an erection but it still works very well. I did try
Cialis back in Nov. and found it disappointing. Recently I decided to
give it another try. My response is similar to yours. It is subtle and
the effect lasts for as much as a couple of days BUT it did not give me
a hard erection (even with mechanical stimulation) without additional
help, which I got from using a **** ring along with it.
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




Copyright © 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
666