Can Off-Topic "Taylor" give Definition of "Off-Topic"

I fail to see how mention of The Universal Test/Inventory Scorer
can be seen as off-topic in a sci newsgroup where persons are interested
in personality inventories and the scoring thereof.

The only off-topic person is "Taylor" and his hoodlum gang.

What is really disgraceful is that no one stands up against the
thugs. Shows the untrustworthiness of the psychotherapy field.

In fact, my google research shows that psychology people here
including practicing psychologist solicited the thugs and others
encouraged them.

Being as the universal test is trademarked and is not related to your
program, you are not only illegal but off topic.

See prior post regarding the trademark, and at this point I suppose this
fact should also be pointed out to the other person who is also financially
responsible for your infringements.

--
Iceman Ph.D.
Shadow Slayer
TINC

Brad, since you solicited the "thugs" and offered them monies which you
never did pay off. And since you claimed to be a Dr. and a practicing
psychologist at the time then the above paragraph is related to you.

So tell me, why are you so disappointed in yourself Bradley L. Jesness?

--
Iceman Ph.D.
Shadow Slayer
TINC

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 01:26:37 +0100 (CET), Brad Jesness, the coward
afraid to speak for himself and prefers to hide behind phantom
supporters, who also happen to be hiding as Nomen Nescio

That's simple, anything you post, Brad. You may be the topic in some
groups but your posts are never on-topic. They are always self-serving
spam or outright attacks and stalking.

As usual your lies go nowhere. I would just be wasting my time asking
you why you were spaz'n out in nh.general, wouldn't I? Yep. Like any
other question you can't answer with a lie you just run and then post
yet another idiotic rant.

--
Taylor

Hammer of Thor, September 2002

On 05 Nov 2003 in sci.psychology.psychotherapy, edo
<nobody@cryptorebels.net> made his/her contribution to mankind by
stating in news:b1e168edf5a7c494d669551d8c989ae2@cryptorebels .net:

your research is flawed idiot

--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question

ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
http://prozac.iscool.net

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode test 33Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

1 13th July 22:22 anonymous via the cypherpunks tonga remailer External User Posts: 1	Can Off-Topic "Taylor" give Definition of "Off-Topic" I fail to see how mention of The Universal Test/Inventory Scorer can be seen as off-topic in a sci newsgroup where persons are interested in personality inventories and the scoring thereof. The only off-topic person is "Taylor" and his hoodlum gang.

2 13th July 22:22 edo External User Posts: 1	Can Off-Topic "Taylor" give Definition of "Off-Topic" What is really disgraceful is that no one stands up against the thugs. Shows the untrustworthiness of the psychotherapy field. In fact, my google research shows that psychology people here including practicing psychologist solicited the thugs and others encouraged them.

3 13th July 22:22 iceman External User Posts: 1	Can Off-Topic "Taylor" give Definition of "Off-Topic" Being as the universal test is trademarked and is not related to your program, you are not only illegal but off topic. See prior post regarding the trademark, and at this point I suppose this fact should also be pointed out to the other person who is also financially responsible for your infringements. -- Iceman Ph.D. Shadow Slayer TINC

4 13th July 22:22 iceman External User Posts: 1	Can Off-Topic "Taylor" give Definition of "Off-Topic" Brad, since you solicited the "thugs" and offered them monies which you never did pay off. And since you claimed to be a Dr. and a practicing psychologist at the time then the above paragraph is related to you. So tell me, why are you so disappointed in yourself Bradley L. Jesness? -- Iceman Ph.D. Shadow Slayer TINC

6 20th July 23:43 thepsyko External User Posts: 1	Can Off-Topic "Taylor" give Definition of "Off-Topic" On 05 Nov 2003 in sci.psychology.psychotherapy, edo <nobody@cryptorebels.net> made his/her contribution to mankind by stating in news:b1e168edf5a7c494d669551d8c989ae2@cryptorebels .net: your research is flawed idiot -- /(bb\|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question ThePsyko Public Enemy #7 http://prozac.iscool.net