larryfr

The 'single' schemas treats the transaction as a batch, 'multiple' breaks
the do***ent into encounters. That's about the limit of my knowledge on
it. Please let me know if you have questions on this and I can try
engaging some HIPAA specific resources.

Larry Franks

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
Subscribe at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/servicedesks/msdn/nospam.asp
&SD=msdn
--------------------
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| From: "Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
| Sender: "Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
| Subject: HIPAA: 837 Single & Multiple
| Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:50:36 -0800
| Lines: 7
| Message-ID: <0cb501c39d62$d8e0e8c0$a501280a@phx.gbl>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="iso-8859-1"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
| Thread-Index: AcOdYtjgsbu6g1lDThSqLs2z+alYzg==
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.general:11552
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA13 10.40.1.165
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
|
| Can anyone please tell me that whats the difference
| between 837profeesional_single, and
| 837professional_multiple.
|
| Thanks
| Jeff
|
|

kmasek

The multiple breaks apart the 837 incomming for you. For example, if
you have one file with multiple claims in it, using the multi-schema,
biztalk will create multiple claim files for you in your output
automatically. That way, you don't need a preprocessor to split the
file.

Kevin

aamir

I would like to get a better understanding of this.

Using multiple Scenario:
If there is a claim with multiple ST & SE segments within
one ISA & IEA. It is split into individual files with
separate ISA, IEA, ST & SE for those individual files?

is that so?
Thanks
Aamir

example, if

multi-schema,

output

to split the