beatlegreg1966

http://www.anycities.com/user/uberkinder/index.html

johnny dupe

amazing! simply amazing

it's amazing how paul's face changes when someone stretches and changes the
size of one of his pictures. add to that, the fact that paul was
experimenting with drugs a little bit more and aged 3 more years, that might
explain the black rings under his eyes.

plus, it's not out of line for a celebrity to get his or her eyebrows
plucked and/or reshaped.

but logic would ruin the "paul is dead" theory.


-- john w.
http://www.johnnydupe.homestead.com

beatlegreg1966

I interviewed the guy who runs the website on my radio show. He was SERIOUS. He
totally 100% without a doubt believes this. He's also got a theory that says
all the associates of the Beatles (Mal Evans, Brian Esptein, Maureen, Linda,
George, John) were all murdered in some sort of conspiracy to cover up the Paul
replacement. I guess sales of Catcher in the Rye are going up again.

anonymous

Wow...I'm convinced....

If Paul is dead then, and Stu, John and George are too, that only leaves one
surviving original Beatle...Pete Best,
....as heir apparent to the throne...

Pete Best should be immediately knighted....

And William Sheppard should confess his sins, give up his knighthood, stop
trying to sing Beatle songs in his concerts, and be sent for summary
execution by beheading at the Tower of London...

(Another good vocal clue is the live version of "I'm Down" on "The Concert
For New York"...the Fake Paul can't even hit the high notes......the real
Paul had NO problem singing those notes....)

(w I L L i a m S H E p p A R d)
(b I L L y S H E A R s)

danny caccavo

Well, his picture superimposition was pretty lame. I mean, one picture
was taken with a wider lens, there's no way it would line up.

But this is silly. I suppose we should let that guy have his fun.
And they say WE here in RMB have no life? <g>

dc

mister charlie

I have not bothered looking at the site nor will I. But If the anon
poster is referring to Paul's "replacement", that person was William
CAMPBELL, was it not?

steve

But how do we know that the REAL Danny isn't trapped in a
subway in New York, and his replacement moved to the West
Coast wherer fewer people would spot the swap!

--
steve@stephencarterNOSPAM.net
Nothing is Beatle Proof!!

paulcrowder

The part I like the best is when he uses a picture of Paul and Jane
Asher from the early 60's to point out Paul's height in relation to
Jane, then another picture from 1967 showing that Paul is now much
taller than Jane Asher in that picture:

http://www.anycities.com/user/uberkinder/fc42.html

What gets me is that he goes through great lengths to show all the
supposedly obvious differences in the real Paul and the imposter Paul,
such as bone structure, pupillary distance, and height, but doesn't
even notice that in his second picture Jane Asher has been replaced by
Linda Eastman!

Paul

doctor thomas b. who

That website does have a good point though. Paul did look completely
different after '66...