28th April 18:00
Beatle under the influence of Beatles
Did you even look at the web page I gave?? (I was refering to a
mathematical statement, viz that in a consistent logical system
sufficiently powerful to speak of "truth" in a meaningful way, and which is
not "non-standard", it is impossible to define an internal "truth"
predicate) which is correct if stated properly, but admittedly probably
isn't what you have/had in mind - as I said. Really I was having a little
joke. Your response might have been appropriate to other posts which
attempted to enter into the discussion as intended, but sort of missed the
train in this context!
-= rags =-
To reply by email, use "@" not "__A@T__"
<rags AT math . mcgill . ca>
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.