|
3
15th July 16:30
External User
|
Digging to China
HOWEDY Dixie Sugar,
You mean HOWE do you E***TINGUISH ANY behavior.
It's EZ!
ALL the INSTRUCTIONS are in your FREE copy of
The Amazing Puppy Wizard's FREE WWW Wits'
End Dog Training Method Manual available for FREE at http://www.doggydoright.com
PROBABLY they try to do it behind your back
on accHOWENT of you've scolded them pryor.
HOWEver, THAT ain't NO PROBLEM for The
Amazing Puppy Wizard on accHOWENT of
THAT'S HOWE COME HE'S The Amazing Puppy Wizard.
REMEMBER? <{) ; ~ ) >
ALL behaviors are the SAME SAME SAME SAME.
ALL behaviors are E***TINGUISHED or MODIFIED
to YOUR DESIRE NEARLY INSTANTLY using
EFFECTIVE NON PHYSICAL SCIENTIFIC and
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONING, RELAXATION
and DESENSITIZATION techniques as taught
in your FREE copy of The Amazing Puppy
Wizard's FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual.
The OBJECTIVE and IF DONE PUPPERLY, the RESULT
of BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION is the dog QUICKLY BECOMES CONDITIONED
and SELF CON-TROLLED
so YOU don't have to BE THERE to ENFORCE CON-TROLL.
THAT'S the DIFFERENCE between EFFECTIVE NON
PHYSICAL SCIENTIFIC and PSYCHOLOGICAL CON-
DITIONING Vs AVERSIVES / AVODIANCE & BRIBERY
as the E***PERTS tell us to use:
Hello dog ma,
"dog ma" <"karma-dog(NOSPAM)"@excite.com> wrote in message news:3A4BA282.6BA77DC3@excite.com...
If "Its probably useless to punish the dog for digging
up the trees" and will probably make the problem
worse, WHAT IS TELLING HER "NO!" and removing
her going to accomplish???
Punishment is NOT subjective. IT either IS, or IT AIN'T.
That makes making value judgement calls EASY. If you
gotta think, "is this punishment, is this going to hurt, scare,
intimidate, admonish, bribe or withhold attention or affection"
then, it PROBABLY IS PUNISHMENT and is CHOWENTER
PRODUCTIVE at best and DEADLY, in it's worst case scenario.
Well, that's calling koehler a LIAR, isn't it? I know you're
not a koehler trainer, but you've GOT to UNDERSTAND
that MOST of our rpdb regulars ARE koehler trainers
and as such, they're a sensitive lot, and would prefer
that you not disparage their life's work.
They only kill dogs that are from bad breeding,
because well bred dogs are designed through
the marvels of selective breeding, to be HONEST
in their work AND SO F****VING... whatever
the heell all that means...
Yes. Occasionally, you'll find a decent class where pain
fear force intimidation avoidance bribery are not prerequisite.
But for everyone I meet who's had an excellent experience
with "obedience classes," I meet two who've left training with
a traumatized dog and many of them come out of it with bad
temperament problems, and they're told to kill the dog because
he's 99% good, but that 1% of the time they get psycho, is too much.
Tying or crating a dog can cause a lot of temperament
problems, for sure. HOWEver, we can address those
problems, but NOT before the dog has had a little training.
And you should have kept going over to a can you've set
out to be available for such an instance, and then casually
walk by the damaged area, and subtly ask, "what's that?"
as you drop the can with pennies in it and continue about
your business without saying anything. That's the only
instance sound will be used without being followed by
instant, prolonged, non physical praise. It's all in your
FREE copy of my FREE Wits' End Dog Training Method manual.
BWEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAHAHAHHAHAAA!!!
THAT'S SUCCESS???
You could have forgone all that had you read
my manual four months ago.
It's a little more involved than just occupy the dog with
toys and exercise. That won't have much of an impact
at all. The secret to success is in the method.
Your pal, Jerry "The Phony," Howe,
The Puppy Wizard <{) ; ~ ) >
==================
From: Marshall Dermer (dermer@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu)
Subject: Re: Jerry's Dog Training Manual
Date: 2001-07-12 06:49:13 PST
And how do we know this aspect of his advice is right?
Jerry is not God and his manual is not the Bible.
His advice could be subject to an empirical ****ysis.
--Marshall =================
"Marshall Dermer" <dermer@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message news:9ihtee$7ib$1@uwm.edu...
From: Paul B (NOSPAMpanders@zfree.co.nz)
Subject: Re: Jerry's Dog Training Manual
Date: 2001-07-12 00:13:28 PST
Hello Marshall,
The way I view it from my observation of how
my dogs react is that the distraction interrupts
the dogs thought, not for good or bad, just
interrupts, the dog is therefore distracted for
a second and then will either continue the
behaviour or do something else.
The praise reassures the dog that the sound
distraction is not a threat or punishment,
however if everytime the dog resumes a
particular behaviour it's distracted immediately
(and praised immediately for reassurance) then
it quickly decides this behaviour is not fulfilling
and it ceases.
A dog will offer another behaviour in it's place
and if that is acceptable to us then we let it be
otherwise the distraction continues until a suitable
alternate behaviour is offered.
One example, Sam used to jump up on me
when I arrived home, I would shake can to
distract him right at the moment he was
about to jump up, after about 4 repetitions
he tried sitting and offering me his paw, of
course this was fine so I let it be.
While the concept of shake cans is not new,
I haven't read any other advice that says to
praise immediately regardless of what the
dog does next (the common advice is to
praise once the dog is doing a desired
behaviour or at least stopped the unwanted
behaviour), this is unique to Jerry (and Marilyn)
and from my own experiences is an important
part of the process.
--- Original Message -----
From: Paul Bousie
To: The Puppy Wizard
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: Geday.
Hey J,
I see nothings changed on the NG. Still the same
old crappy advice and misunderstanding of the
only advice worth reading.
The problem with your method J is that I can't
answer the questions on the NG no more, people
are after a quick fix, they don't want to understand
that dog training requires a disiplined method, I'm
now really understanding that they are all result
orientated, they want the dog to sit, to down, to
stay, to come, to stop it's "bad" behaviours, they
want to stamp out each anxiety one at a time not
realising they create a new one as they deal with
the last.
I feel sorry for them, they don't understand, they
don't even realise the errors of thier ways and
they arn't self thinkers, they follow the majority,
after all if everyone says thats the way then it
must be. I've finally realised people don't want
to learn to train dogs they want a trained dog,
they want a little puppet that sits and stays and
downs and does all the nice doggy stuff or so
they think, then when the dog acts like a dog
they come squealing to the NG asking how to
stop the dog being a dog.
I have a nice little visulisation of a dogs mind
that I think demonstrates the way we approach
dog training. Imagine lots of little circles all in a
cluster, each one representing a dog anxiety or
behaviour ( desied or not), each circle represents
something about the dog, all of them create what
a dog is.
The traditional way to train a dog is to stamp out
the "bad" circles, try to eliminate as many as you
can, problem is each one you stamp out another
takes it's place (anxiety circles can't be destroyed
they just change), obviously it's a futile exercise,
but thats the traditional way.
Now imagine a big circle that completely surrounds
all the small circles, this big circle is the whole dog,
that's what we get hold of with all the little circles
inside, we don't see the little circles we see the BIG
circle the macro as you put it and use that to train.
I laugh now when I see posts critisising you, they
are critising something they don't even understand
or even have the capacity to understand.
See ya,
Paul
=====================
"Paul B" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3edc57c5@clear.net.nz...
100% TOTAL NON PHYSICAL CONTROL, NEARLY
INSTANTLY, BY NEARLY EVERY FREE WWW Wits'
End Dog Training Method Manual Student.
It's the GENTLEST, FASTEST, MOST EFFECTIVE,
NON FORCE, NON CONFRONTATIONAL, NON BRIBE,
SCIENTIFIC and PSYCHOLOGICAL technique in the
Whole Wild World, BAR NONE.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Bousie" <paulbousie@clear.net.nz>
To: "'Don Fitz'" <donfitz69@hotmail.com>; <Amanda@DCFWatch.com>
Cc: <jhowe2@bellsouth.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 5:45 AM
Subject: RE: Jerry Howe
==============================
|