![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
2nd November 04:51
External User
Posts: 1
|
This is most likely to be the content of the messages you're sending
rather than the structure of the emails as created by PHPMailer. I doubt it but stranger things have happened. However this has nothing to do with PHP itself, and would get a better response from a PHPMailer-specific list (I assume there is one). AFAIK BAYES_99 means it thinks there is a 99% chance of it being spam, that's very high for something you're saying is an operational email. Is that link the only thing they contain? If so try adding more text. It's also worth noting that this score comes from a system that's capable of learning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_spam_filtering -Stut -- http://stut.net/ |
|
|
4
2nd November 04:51
External User
Posts: 1
|
Hello everybody,
thank you for the reply. Stut schrieb: I found that it almost any e-mail sent now from the site has that 3.5 spam score. Registration e-mails, Nitification e-mails etc. You are right. I was just wondering if somebody else here has experienced it today in their apps. 99%? How can they be so wrong? There must be a serious reason for that. The message looks like this: --- Hello xy, You are receiving this email because you are watching the topic, "Topicname " at Community This topic has received a reply since your last visit. You can use the following link to view the replies made. http://link If you no longer wish to watch this topic you can either click the "Stop watching this topic link" found at the bottom of the topic above (after you login!), or by clicking the following link: http://www.link --- STrange, isn't it? `Thanks, will do. Best regards, Merlin |
|
|
6
2nd November 04:53
External User
Posts: 1
|
Bayes usually refers to the Bayseian (sp?) algorithm where the system
"learns" what is junk based on users' marking things as spam. So if you add a bunch of people to your list that don't expect to be on it, and they all mark your email as spam, whammo, all your emails are marked as spam. Or so I understand it... Or possibly mis-understand it. :-v -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? |
|
|
7
2nd November 10:17
External User
Posts: 1
|
Richard Lynch schrieb:
That sounds logical. However those e-mails are opt-in. So it is very unlikely that this has happend. I also checked red lists etc. I believe that I did not configure the server well and the php sending function so that the header is missing important settings or so. After all the Bayes_99 is the only spam trigger. Unfortunatelly I can only find postings on the net where people talk about how to tweak their spamassasin filtering. Nobody who sends e-mails seams to have a problem. Is that only me? (and of course the spamers :-) ). I tried to send it directly from unix command: mail -s "This is a test" email@example.com That one gets flaged with bayes_50 (spam score 0). After all most of the e-mails I receive in my private account are even bayes_00 (-2.x). Do you believe it is the IP-Adress? I could not find it anywhere on the red lists. All looks clean. Any ideas? Thank you for any hints, Merlin |
|