jochem

has anyone here downloaded/compiled 5.3 and played with namespaces?
have you encountered any issues/problems?

I'd like to hear from you as I've been asked to compile a reference do***enting anything/everything
people may have come across (so far as namespaces go), if you have some reproduce code, all
the better.

rgds,
Jochem

jochem

Jochem Maas schreef:

so no-one? really? none of you muppets ever even smelled a namespace?

lester

Have to work through the 5.2 -> 5.3 issues first before DELIBERATELY
introducing something that breaks compatibility with customer sites

--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php

listpit

I haven't tried php namespaces yet, but have implemented them for my own
projects, to
1) avoid the ever enduring hassle of setting directory paths for every
host where the project lives in one form or another (dev, test, production).
2) calling classes according to their logical structure, in stead of
figuring out in what freaking folder I put the class.

namespaceMyProjectName('db.mysql.MySqlHandler');

Nice and easy, although at a performance cost atm. I'm looking forward
to seeing how PHP handles it.

greetz,


Stijn

gmane

Namespaces are sweet and all, but having worked without them for some
time, I've certainly developed fairly ingrained ways of working without
them.

Adapting to use them will take a long time, but I doubt I'm gonna jump
in head feet straight away...

Col

--

Colin Guthrie
gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
http://colin.guthr.ie/

Day Job:
Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Open Source:
Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/]
PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]

jochem

Lester Caine schreef:


I am aware of your situation/opinion/etc from internals mailing list,
I'm interested to hear from people who have grabbed a copy of 5.3 and
had a go at *trying out* the new stuff.

Also I did stipulate 'play' which implies testing the new functionality,
not rolling it into production codebases.

jochem

metastable schreef:


probably a big performance cost. that said I'd like to hear/see
some more of your implementation, could you elaborate?

well download an alpha of php5.3 and take a look, more testers
are needed ... this is a major addition and there are plenty of
edge cases (it seems) that have yet to be covered.

robert

I like to use techniques that have wide version applicability.
Namespaces are a great feature that I look forward to leveraging, but at
this time they would cause any application to become backward
incompatible with any PHP version less than 5.3. As it stands I've
always been particularly **** about using long class/function names
using the prefix technique to prevent collision.

Normally I'd kick the wheels a bit, but I haven't had a lot of time for
kicking wheels lately :/

Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP