Mombu the Politics Forum

Go Back   Mombu the Politics Forum > Politics > antisemitism & racism
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read




Reply
1 5th November 10:26
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default antisemitism & racism



antisemitism & racism
__________________________________________________ _________________________________


Antisemitism is racism directed against Jewish people.

Racism is believing that people of some races are inferior to others and treating them differently
because of this.

So it would seem that antisemitism is believing that Jewish people are inferior to other races
and treating Jewish people differently because of this.

Palestinians and Middle Eastern Jews are genetically the same.

So it would seem that antisemitism is believing that Jewish people or Palestinian people are inferior
to other races and treating Jewish people or Palestinian people differently because of this.

__________________________________________________ _________________________________
  Reply With Quote


 


2 5th November 10:26
sailor
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default antisemitism & racism



Please trim headers when hitting "reply all" -- Alt.gathering rainbow
does not support cross posting -- Thanks.
  Reply With Quote


 


3 10th November 12:02
neptune3
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default antisemitism & racism


The Jews say it is fine to consider a country an enemy. People can
think
Iraq is their enemy and no one says that is outrageous. They may argue
whether Iraq is really an enemy or not, but they don't just dismiss
the idea of enemies out of hand.

Then the Jews say that it is not OK to be against a group that is
not
a country, such as the Jews. Jews say only countries can be enemies
and we
should never fight our real enemies, who are the Jews themselves.

A Jew said the French were "cheese eating surrender monkeys". Why
can't the
French howl "anti-French" like the Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because
the French don't
control the media, Jews do.

This is what President Nixon said:

http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html

"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my
policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U.S.
control
the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers,
the
motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies. And
there is a
force that we have to take into consideration."

The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:

"One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences
within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
mostly environmental.

The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
scored above the Blacks. (88)

A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)

RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY

IQ

Parental IQ 115.35
Biological Children 109.4
White Adopted children 105.6
Mulatto parents adopted children 98.5
Black parents adopted children 89.4

Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.
Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
(91)"

(88) Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
Children Adopted By White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
p.26-739

(89) Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
p.17-135

(90) Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27

(91) Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20


www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info/ www.nsm88.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




666