: > Joe,
: > Interesting reply. I get the sense you see the Quebec distribution system
: > as a model for beer and wine.
:
: No, no, no, I am not. I am just using the Quebec example of retail
: dtistribution as an example. On the wholesale side they are just as
: corrupt as the Ontario system. For instance you probably know that
: only Quebec brewed beers, and Quebec bottled wines are allowed to be
: sold in the groceries and deps. That means the only wine sold in the
: deps came to Canada (because the Quebecers have a cultural bias to
: Canadian wine) in bulk barrels. This policy also tilts the beer
: selection to the "slop" from Molson's and Labatt's. You have to go to
: the SAQ if you want for instance Corona. They do the same thing in
: Newfoundland, but there Labatts and Molson brew Newfoundland exclusive
: beers which IMHO are great.
: As for price, I have seen more expensive, and less expensive. Just
: matters where you go to buy beer. Very recently I saw a case of
: Export for under $27 bucks. Add PST + GST + Deposit and that is less
: than $34 that it is in Ontario. In all, the average price is about
: the same as Ontario.
: As for deposit, I don't see them as a problem. You get your money
: back after all, and you help the environment.
: In all I know you agree with me in that the best system would be the
: open system. Any licensed retailer to be able to sell any beer that
: they choose to sell. This way the corner store sells the common
: stuff, and for the rarer stuff like Courage Director's Bitter, you can
: go to the speciality store or large grocery store. Works in Britain
: and America just fine. :
: > I'm not anything. I vote for whoever seems logical.
:
: I was just joking with the NDP comment.
:
: I'm just pointing out some possible oversights in your logic.
:
: And I yours. That why we are here, to learn from each other.
:
: The $600 million is not pure
: > profit.
:
: I know. The sad thing is that when the privatization train comes
: around, they include the tax proceeds that would come LCBO or not in
: the pitch to keep the monopoly. My opinion, with the massive
: underground smuggling and moonshining going on (bigger than the media
: reports) which is reportedly over half of all booze in some border
: towns and in Toronto, if they posted sane tax rates they could recoup
: more taxes then they do now.
:
: Even the govt admits that it is tax. It is no different than sales
: > tax or GST.
:
: They even include that in those "hurray" press releases.
:
: The revenue goes into general tax revenue and ends up paying for
: > hospitals, under-priced electricity, MPPs salaries, provincial prisons,
: > police etc., etc.
:
: Just like tax money does in the rest of the world, which in almost the
: whole world is on the private system.
:
: The LCBO despite your allegations does a pretty good job
: > of quality control, not taste or "quality" but contamination, adulteration,
: > mislabelling, etc., etc.
:
: I never alledged bad quality. The quality standards I agree with and
: the testing should be kept LCBO or not. Supposedly the government
: does such a fine job testing meat for the private grocery retailing
: system so I agree with you there.
:
: Believe it or not but a number of years back some
: > Italian vintners were making wine or the equivalent from ox-blood and the
: > pumpings from the bilges of banana boats or so it was alleged. In any case
: > they lost enormous shares of market for years.
:
: Yes that is a problem anywhere in any food business. Just like the
: tainted meat scandal today. As someone who worked in the food
: industry for years, one of the hardest jobs in food processing is to
: keep the process clean. The bad apples spoil the whole industry.
: By the way, you don't hear people demanding the we nationalize
: slaughterhouses.
:
: At one time around the turn
: > of the 20th century whiskey was regularly adulterated with lye to give it
: > "kick". Even today in Europe a lot of wine is made in concrete fermentation
: > tanks. It needs to be tested for purity before consumption.
:
: Same with the infamous antifreeze in wine trick. Thats why I support
: testing of not just wine, but of all foods. :
: > Alcohol including beer, cigarettes and gambling are all related in that they
: > are classified by many people as things that only sinners consume or
use.
:
: Maybe I just hang around and associate with the wrong people, I
: suppose. I come from an ethnic group that doesn't consider beer,
: cigs, or gambling as evil. In fact my ethnic group is overrepresented
: in the casino industry in North America. My family regards those
: industries as good solid well paying carrers, and no we are not white
: trash. We do the whole church thing. I guess its just your
: upbringing I guess.
: By the way, I suspect its people like us that changed Toronto for
: "Toronto the Good" to Cosmopolitan and International Toronto. :
: > They are all taxed at a very high level and no one needs them to live.
:
: Taxing them is great since they are non-essentials. Most economists
: agree going all the way back to Adam Smith. Problem is when you have
: a neighbour that has low taxes. Tax Parity is important. :
: > History proves that they are all addictive to certain people.
:
: I refuse to believe addiction is a disease. I think addiction is weak
: willpower and thus I don't feel sorry for them. :
: > Prohibition and/or temperance has everything to do with morality. The
: > Christian/Judean ethic says if it is fun it must be immoral, man is supposed
: > to live in misery or something similar.
:
: Thats more the Anglo-Saxon Edwardian attitude than the
: Christian/Judean attitude. Go to Italy, Spain, or even Tel Aviv and
: you'll see. I've been to all those places and the joie de vive is
: infectious, even with the problems in for instance Tel Aviv.
:
: Canada is the worlds last bastion of Edwardian or even Victorian
: values. Look at how the guidebooks describe us, and look at how the
: history books describe Victorians and see the similarities.
:
: Canada came of age in that era. We defined that era, and were
: impacted by it more than any other country or province on earth.
: Those people and the mindset is still around, and it holds us back in
: subtle ways.
:
: Way back when time was first turned
: > on a bright dude figured out that money in the form of taxes allowed the
: > morally superior to give a form of absolution to the sinners. It is not
: > much different than dispensations that used to be sold. At one time the
: > powerful used to taxes spices.
:
: I see you agree with my prior assessment!

:
: > I don't agree with you regarding marijuana. If it was readily as available
: > and taxed people would buy it rather than grow it.
: I've made hundreds if
: > not 1000s of gallons of wine and it is a lot of work to make a decent
: > product.
:
: True, but growing weed is easier than making wine. You don't need a
: hydro lab to make weed, it only helps.
:
: I still contend that the Americans are the main reason drugs
: > aren't legal. At one time you could buy heroin at your corner drug store
: > that's about 100 years ago. The Americans suffer from a streak of morality
: > that runs very deep. Deep down a large percentage of them are very
: > uncomfortable with anything that smacks of pure pleasure.
:
: You know, I have to agree. They wrote the UN drug laws. They forced
: the world to sign on to it. The only reason Holland and Switzerland
: haven't received trade sanctions is because they are too rich and
: influential. Weed is technically still illegal in those countries,
: and Holland does go after the growers, but the police and cities turn
: a blind eye. Its comparable to the prostitution system in Canada.
: It's technically illegal, but under a different name they are
: regualted and licensed and even have ads in the phone book.
:
: There is a book
: > called Fire and Ice that illustrates some of the differences between US and
: > Canada. It is largely statistics but very interesting.
:
: I have the book. I liked the comprehansive states, but the authors
: personal biases were evident and I as someone in the science field
: felt uncompfortable with that. (Adams really doesn't like guns)
:
: The other issue is
: > the vested interests that have a say in "the war on drugs" If drugs were
: > legal there would be less cops, less payoffs and graft. No one is against
: > morality and very few people question the costs/benefits issue when moral
: > purity is involved.
:
: I think people and non-Sun Canadian media are catching on to that. We
: will go legal one day sooner than anticipated. The economic threats
: by the Us are unsettling but we just have to remember that "we are too
: close to ignore (like Holland) and too close to invade (like Columbia : and Afghanistan)" :
: > You argue that a competitive market is a healthy market. That may be true
: > in the economics text books. Unfortunately there are sufficient
: > occurrences of collusion by so-called competitors that most countries have
: > anti-trust laws and fair trade acts. Your mention of the oil companies is
: > probably an example of collusion.
:
: Collusion by definition is an unhealthy, uncompetitive market. A good
: example of good competition in a regulated market is telephone long
: distance. Remember how much it cost 10 years ago??? Now if you look
: you can get under $0.05 a minute all day. :
: > I've never been able to make a beer that I liked except at a u-brew place
: > and the cost then was getting up to that of buying it.
:
: Where do you go? Shop around. You can average $15 a case if you
: look. Myself I cross the border often so I pick up beer duty free.
: $12.99US with $0.10 deposit. :
: > I agree with you about the beer stores, they are a disgrace. From the
: > manufacturer's point of view though it is as perfect a retailing set-up as
: > can had.
:
: Of course. That's why they keep them. Make your competitors retail
: thru you. Make outlets artificially scarce to reduce transport costs.
: Can't beat it.
:
: The only thing they want to do now is wipe out the small breweries
: > which they will do if not watched.
:
: I look toward Alberta and Big Rock Brewery there to see how a small
: brewery flourished in a privatized system with no floor pricing. I
: think as a part owner in a small brewery, the advantages outweigh the
: disadvantages in a private open system. They have more capacity and
: muscle, like a linebacker. We are more nimble like the running back.
: Different positions, both advantageous to any team.
:
: I think there is a place for both in the Ontario market. Now if the
: Big Two start buying small guys to kill them off a la "Pop Shoppe"
: style, then the regulators should come in. That and exclusive
: agreement I think should be banned. They go against an open market
: and are currently illegal in Ontario.
:
: If wider distribution occurred its quite
: > likely that they would lose more market share with people discovering that
: > the stuff they sell is pretty poor stuff. : : True. :
: > Most people are content with the current set-up. As long as it is available
: > they buy. I'm sure that it could be sold morgues and people would be
happy.
:
: True but most people are not leaders, they are led. They don't have
: the knowledge that they are ripped off. The negative of democracy is
: that you put most of the power in the people who don't know what the
: hell they are talking about. You have lawyer/politicians talking
: about Nuclear Reactors in Ontario for instance.
: It is the Canadian ethic to be on the timid side. Same with beer.
: They just don't know better. Most people don't travel. They don't
: know the rest of the world can buy beer at the corner store anytime
: they want. The thought just doesn't even occur to them.
:
: CYA
Joe,
You talk about how phone rates have dropped but you forget a number of
points. one is the "last mile is owned by a very few large companies, the
cost has come down largely because the entry cost into long haul became a
lot cheaper with the advent of fibre optics etc., the new companies had no
large expensive physical plant to maintain i.e. wireline service. You imply
that the oligopoly had to allow completion but I suspect the real fact is
that they couldn't prevent it.
I must read up on Victorian/Edwardian morality. You may be correct. What
little I know about it seems to indicate that they were a bunch of
hypocrites who preached chastity and celibacy while impregnating their
servants and sleeping around with their best friends wives or husbands as
the case may have been. In fairness it would appear from reading that
alcohol was a particularly problem in the 18th and 19th centuries. Whether
"improved" morality or improved living conditions helped to alleviate the
problem I don't know. In any event after years of repression of the
consumption of alcohol the govt now sees it as a source of revenue and is
slightly encouraging people to consume. Its a chuckle to see the moral
streak of our friends to the south who have absolutely no qualms about
collateral damage to non-combatants but scream in high fury about a
president who apparently enjoyed fellatio in the oval office with one or
more women who knew perfectly well what they were doing. I wonder how much
the line "I blew the President" is worth on a job resume? They are also on
the moral high ground vis drugs. I think it is not some much against drugs
but in favour of the anti-drug industry. Its big big business and employs
millions of people. BTW apparently Holland just started selling marijuana
in pharmacies today by prescription $50 for 5 grams I think. I have no idea
if that's a good price or not.
I disagree with you about addiction. I think there are people who are
predisposed to addictions of all types including gambling. I think the
addiction provides them with a gratification of some kind which they cannot
do without whether it is physical or mental is not really relevant.
Basically it gives them a buzz.
You are correct about people having a very parochial view of their world.
I've moved few times in my life and each new community was wrapped up in
its own little set of problems and views of what is right and what is wrong.
I don't think Canadians are timid they are just cautious.
claus