david_l_simpson

If Camejo is elected, might he not push for more of this?

Good thing -- congratulations.


I'll be watching.

I just started a new thread concerning Camejo -- he really might
have a shot because most people apparently don't care much for the
Terminator nor for Issa to replace Gray Davis. (I read this in a
Financial Times article.) More than 50% favor recalling Davis (even
in more-liberal Northern Calfornia you may encounter people with
opinions on this, or see the petition tables at the shopping centers),
and he may well be ousted.


Dave Simpson

pulver

Marie, You are right, in part, but no one party can claim
responsibility for the mess that has been in the making
since 1945.

Every governor and every legislature has a share in the
culpability. None has had any concerns past the next election.

Consequently, without a long range development plan, the
towns and cities, like Topsy, just "grewed" until the state
has exceeded its available resources.

The cure for all of this will be very painful and I doubt
there is a politician of any stripe in all of California
with the guts to do the job.

maceanruig

Republicans on the other hand blame Clinton for everything. It's getting
a little old and has no particular evidence behind it but it makes them feel good.

rene

news:<w3cOa.25693$I8.14581@rwcrnsc53>...

That's not true, Honey. We all realize you Democrats WISH you could
isolate your Party's woes to Clinton, but alas, you cannot. Why? Because
the overwhelming majority of the Democrats in the House and the Senate
EXCUSED Clinton's behavior. (Once again, it's never THEIR fault) But the
fact that those Democrats EXCUSED his foul behavior means that they too are
guilty. No, the failings of the Democrat Party are quite widespread, and
go wayyyyyyyy beyond merely Clinton himself.

But it IS a mark of the ongoing Democrat Party Collective Stupidity that you
Democrats don't even realize yet what an incredible liability that sick man
is to your ailing Party.

maceanruig

And pigs can fly as well.


On the other hand it might mean that his "foul behavior" exists mainly in
the mind of loons like yourself.


Not being a democrat I could care. It's too bad, on the other hand, that
you don't realize yet what an incredible liabilty that Bush is to the
country. But you will. And I'm sure you will blame Clinton for that as well.

david_l_simpson

Wishful thinking!

The Democrats in California currently have voted to give driver's
licenses to illegal immigrants.


Dave Simpson

david_l_simpson

You have just made an utter fool of yourself to other people with an
IQ above that of our shoelaces. (With other Democrats, who knows, and
who cares?)


Dave Simpson

rene

An excellent suggestion, but one that the Democrat Party rejects. Democrats
OPPOSE tax cuts for the Working Class. Democrats OPPOSE school choice
vouchers for inner-city blacks. Democrats OPPOSE the war on Terrorism.
Democrats OPPOSE the appointment of Hispanics to Court vacancies.
Democrats OPPOSE fixing Social Security and privatizing it. Democrats
OPPOSE reducing our dependence on foreign oil.

me

So do the Republicans only tax cuts for the wealthy. Rush has said
those that make less than 100,000 a year are nothing. I think for a
tax cut to work it needs to be targeting at those between 50 - 250
thousand a year. Luckily I make enough so I'm something to Ruh


Personally I'm devided on this. Don't know why we can't fix all the
schools for all the people. Don't think it is a money thing think it
is because of kids getting away with to much. Also to many paper
pushers spending $5.00 to save $1.00


Thats not true just a few politicians that have there head up there
ass. Many are against the war with Iraq but that wasn't and isn't
part of the war of terrorism that is the war agains WMDs. Iraq had
nothing to do with 9/11 as far as any evidence I have seen. But it is
good Saddam is gone now if he would jut die. Personally think we
should kill terrorist on sight.


Also not true they are against extreme conservetive judges. I too am
against them thoe that get to the supreme court must be able to be
opened minded and not put there religion before the constitution. The
Bible has no place in that do***ent.


Fixing it I have no problem with Privatizing it I do. If it had been
private right prior to enron and worldcom going broke what would have
happened, I know a women you had slightly over a $million for
retirement and now can't even get her medicine anymore. Those Enron
crooks haven't even been put in jail either.

Here we agree 100% I have seen oil rigs that do little to the
eviroment. If done correctly we could get the oil without doing major
damage to our country. Evirimental wackos do have to much power. In
my state they even have made it where you can't take your dog into
many parks as it would upet the animals. Thing is they even do this
with a 23 acre park in the middle of town. They are out of control.

There is room for a compramize on most these isues both sides just
need to get out of the extreme ends of the spectrom and more in the
middle.
"I will harm no one who is not attempting
to harm me. I live will live honorably and
decently, without lying, cheating, or stealing.
I will leave you alone, if you will leave me alone.
But if you try to force your will on me,
if you try to steal from me, I will kill you."

rene

Sorry, but the Working Class does NOT exclude those who are wealthy, as you
are attempting to claim. In fact, about the ONLY way a person becomes
wealthy is by working.

Democrats OPPOSE tax cuts for the Working Class. What the socialist
Democrats propose is the REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH (see "Socialism" or
"Marxism" or "Communism" for details) from the Working Class to the
non-working class.