rocketman

Yes. That is correct. Not only the most foolish; but the most secretive and ruinously fascist.

Yes, exactly. The Neocon "Project for a New American Century" spells it all
out in black-and-white. 9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that the Neocons
needed to kickstart their empire building.


1) Bush has never shot anyone that we know of. He didn't go to war in Viet
Nam like Kerry did.

2) Bush is about as crafty as a cinder block.

3) He is unlikely to have been able to plan, or even conceive of, the WTC
attacks. Too stupid and body-obsessed to care.

4) Bush is only as two-faced as he is told to be. He is a pretty face in a
suit, mugging stupidly for the cameras. That's all.

"Some fishy business" is the understatement of the millenium.


Did you just now begin to realize that there are categories of people
besides the [artificially-polarized] "liberal" and "conservative?"

They are US residents with enough political clout and security clearances to
force NORAD to stand down, to plant demolition charges in the WTC towers,
and a long list of other treasonous activities. This goes far beyond the
events of 9/11, as the 28 redacted pages in the 9/11 report purportedly show in clear detail.


I don't have figments of imagination. I don't rely upon beliefs. I
formulate hypotheses, and use them to find factual evidence from which to
derive a theory, and then prove that theory.

R

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
".........Do they really even exist or are they just a figment of our imagination?........."


They have always existed.
They are probably in every society.
But it's unusual for them to gain so much power in a society.

The US Constitution was designed to protect Americans from this sort of thing.
You might well ask : What went wrong ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~

That's one hell of a theory to prove where above you claimed that US
residents planted demolition charges in the WTC towers whereas the entire
world witnessed a 757 flying into the WTC. I can't wait to see this factual
evidence you claim to have....

LN

republican double standard

I defy you to find a single person who witnessed a 757 flying into the
WTC. I can't wait to see the "factual evidence" you claim to have...


--
"We gave Hussein a chance to allow inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
them in."
- George WMD. Bush, lying on July 14, 2003.

skymodem

: <needham@syix.com> wrote in : news:evNjc.42067$ux4.15112@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com: :
: >
: > "Rocketman" <rocketman@bikerider.com> wrote:
: >
: >
: >> They are US residents with enough political clout and security
: >> clearances
: > to
: >> force NORAD to stand down, to plant demolition charges in the WTC
: >> towers, and a long list of other treasonous activities. This goes
: >> far beyond the events of 9/11, as the 28 redacted pages in the 9/11
: >> report purportedly
: > show
: >> in clear detail.
: >>
: >> > Do they really even exist or are they just a figment of our
: >> > imagination? It's a peculiar world we live in. That much we should
: >> > all be able to agree on.
: >>
: >> I don't have figments of imagination. I don't rely upon beliefs. I
: >> formulate hypotheses, and use them to find factual evidence from
: >> which to derive a theory, and then prove that theory.
: >>
: >> R
: >
: >
: > That's one hell of a theory to prove where above you claimed that US
: > residents planted demolition charges in the WTC towers whereas the
: > entire world witnessed a 757 flying into the WTC. I can't wait to see
: > this factual evidence you claim to have....
: >
: I defy you to find a single person who witnessed a 757 flying into the
: WTC. I can't wait to see the "factual evidence" you claim to have...

I guess I'm a little (like, way way) behind on this WTC conspiracy biz, so
pardon what may seem a disingenious question about your post: are you saying
that the video in which we all clearly observed the airliner crashing into
the WTC was faked?


:
:
: --
: "We gave Hussein a chance to allow inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
: them in."
: - George WMD. Bush, lying on July 14, 2003.

rocketman

The official story of 9/11 has holes that you could fly a jet through:

Why did NORAD fail to scramble jets to intercept hijacked aircraft headed
for NYC?
Where is the wreckage of the Boeing 757 that supposedly hit the Pentagon?
Why is the hole in the Pentagon building much smaller than the nose of a
757?
What happened to all of the bodies of the passengers of the aircraft?
Why were there no forensic investigations conducted at the WTC site?
Why did WTC7, which was not struck by any aircraft, collapse identically to
the Twin Towers, and on the same day?
Why were there "hot spots" of *molten steel* below ground level at each of
the collapsed tower sites for *weeks* after 9/11?

Video footage of the WTC towers shows huge pyroclastic flows of pulverized
material blasting out from the base of each of the WTC towers immediately
before each tower collapsed. A local seismology station reported that each
of these short, pre-collapse blasts registered approximately 2.1 on the
Richter scale (!). The collapses of the WTC towers did not register
significantly on seismographs, and neither did the 1993 WTC bombing, which
was not coupled to the ground (it was a truck bomb). This clearly indicates
that very powerful demolition charges were set prior to 9/11, and detonated
to bring down each of the towers.

There are hundreds of sources all over the web for information on these
topics and more:

http://physics911.org/net/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=17

http://members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/tower-explosions.htm

http://physics911.org/net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=12

http://physics911.org/net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3

http://physics911.org/net/modules/mylinks/visit.php?cid=8&lid=30

That should get you started. Don't take my word for it. Investigate
broadly, and decide for yourself.

R

republican double standard

I think this will help: what kind of aircraft crashed into the WTC?


--
"We gave Hussein a chance to allow inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
them in."
- George WMD. Bush, lying on July 14, 2003.

mordacpreventor

The planes were 747's I believe, not 757's.

republican double standard

767's. But you'll note that needham hasn't responded.

--
"We gave Hussein a chance to allow inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
them in."
- George WMD. Bush, lying on July 14, 2003.

tempest

And that surprises you?

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748