brian

Of course, you lie.
Or do you think you can support your claim?
Dont worry, We all know that liars like you can never support your lies.

a

burp
"Brian" <olinshooter@erols.com> schreef in bericht
news:3F0A2A09.66D5EEC8@erols.com...

bill rood

You mean, have I ever studied the fake theories and propaganda of the
very elite establishment that propagates the false notion of "national
interest"? Not on any formal basis, no. But I did have a history minor
in college and I've read plenty of "political science" and "public
policy" as an informed citizen. But what difference does it make what I
studied? Why don't you address the issue instead of making an ad
hominem attack on someone you don't even know?

Tell me, ass, how can a nation be "interested" in anything? Does it
have a brain? And what, pray tell, is "national interest" but another
term for the "general welfare" of its citizens? So why do so many
people think it's OK for the government to spend huge amounts of money
on the military and foreign policy to promote the "national interest",
but it's socialist evil incarnate to spend money to promote the "general
welfare"? Both are vague, meaningless terms that will be defined very
differently by different citizens.


--
William J. Rood
Rochester, MN

thomandpam

We have no right to anything outside our borders, simple as that.
Bush dropped the ball on 911 and failed to keep an major attack from
happening on his watch and as much as Saddam needed a rope we had not
right to do it without UN sanctions, simple as that. Iraq has opened
a pandoras' box and either Bush lied about WOMD or they are now in
terrorist hands because we damned syre aren't finding them.


what countries do you suggest? New Zealand because they wouldn't
dittohead to Bush like Australia's Howard did? (Wonder if Howard listens to Rush?)

Had nothing to do with it, it was a States rights issue and the war
was started because Lincoln got elected. Lincoln freed the slaves in
the Confederate countries not the ones in the north. THOM

brian

Of course, you lie.
Or do you think you can support your claim?
Dont worry, We all know that liars like you can never support your lies.

a

burp
"Brian" <olinshooter@erols.com> schreef in bericht
news:3F0A2A09.66D5EEC8@erols.com...

thomandpam

We have no right to anything outside our borders, simple as that.
Bush dropped the ball on 911 and failed to keep an major attack from
happening on his watch and as much as Saddam needed a rope we had not
right to do it without UN sanctions, simple as that. Iraq has opened
a pandoras' box and either Bush lied about WOMD or they are now in
terrorist hands because we damned syre aren't finding them.


what countries do you suggest? New Zealand because they wouldn't
dittohead to Bush like Australia's Howard did? (Wonder if Howard listens to Rush?)

Had nothing to do with it, it was a States rights issue and the war
was started because Lincoln got elected. Lincoln freed the slaves in
the Confederate countries not the ones in the north. THOM

thomandpam

We have no right to anything outside our borders, simple as that.
Bush dropped the ball on 911 and failed to keep an major attack from
happening on his watch and as much as Saddam needed a rope we had not
right to do it without UN sanctions, simple as that. Iraq has opened
a pandoras' box and either Bush lied about WOMD or they are now in
terrorist hands because we damned syre aren't finding them.


what countries do you suggest? New Zealand because they wouldn't
dittohead to Bush like Australia's Howard did? (Wonder if Howard listens to Rush?)

Had nothing to do with it, it was a States rights issue and the war
was started because Lincoln got elected. Lincoln freed the slaves in
the Confederate countries not the ones in the north. THOM