tazmanian devil

Uh, exactly *how* did you manage to do that, Taz? What did I lie
about? As for insults, I believe you've ac***ulated more than your
fair share of critics on UseNet.

(and just how would you know that if you have never posted in any
newsgroup but this one as you claim? And if you used two brain cells
to make a spark, you would know that you cannot be on the internet for
more then 5 minutes without you pissing someone off because of the way
you type or the way you answer or when you prove them wrong as I have
you. And in answer to your question , seems that you cannot read the
headers of the post where you whined there was a SS trust fund, and I
smacked you with the tree of reality proving there was no such thing. next?)

Don't know anything about your imposter but you've NOT shown any post
I've initiated in groups other than alt.politics.bush. See the groups
listed above? That's where YOU posted this thread. It's called cross
posting and is not recommended. If I reply to your post (which
appears in alt.politics.bush), it will show up in the other cross
posted NGs as well. But, I only saw it and replied from
alt.politics.bush. I don't "post" in those other NGs.

(another lie as the link I gave clearly shows posts in other groups
beside this one. If he lies about this folks, what else is he lying
about and maybe the other newsgroups were right in KF'ing him. Here is
the link yet again proving that he is a liar, just look at the headers
and you will see this fool starts threads and then leaves the group
when it gets too hot for him or he is proven wrong more times the a
swiss cheese has holes
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=cisco+kid&btnG=Google+Search&meta=group%3Dalt.impeach.bush
)

Still waiting for you to post an example of some thread I initiated
during the last two years in these other NGs. You haven't done that
because I've not inititated a post anywhere else. Don't bother with
only a link, show the THREAD!!!!!

(see above.. and this link is as good as a thread as it clearly shows
a lot of pages where you STARTED threads in other newsgroups)

Still waiting for you to post an example of me name-shifting. You
can't because I haven't.
(see above link)

What's an "indipendent"?

(only smart thing he has done, I usually make an error in spelling
just to piss off the people like Crisco as they go nuts on this and
are very fun to watch. This was the only time he didnt take the bait)

True, Why is that a lie? And why would that get me kicked off all
those other NGs?

(I already told you that you were KF'ed so many times that no one
would answer you being "kicked" off the newsgroup. You can read cant you?)


Actually, I'm somewhat of a centrist with left leanings. I'm a
military vet, have owned firearms for nearly 40 years and am mostly a
fiscal conservative yet I definitely lean left socially.

(Hmmm, King Pinapple-VA Man and quite a few others have disputed your
claim to be a vet. Something about you saying you were in one area
with your unit and it being proved that your unit was never even
there. Or was it the time you claimed to have numerous awards, yet
could never quite say where you got them from or how. A
Vet...riiiggghhhttt!)

I believe in keeping our promises we made to our veterans and NOT
cutting their entitlements. I believe in adequately funding public
education, providing a safety net medical care system, sensible
firearms control, and fair, progressive taxation.

(here is another lie that Crisco got smacked in. He says that the VA
benifits are being cut...yet according to the VA's OWN WEBPAGE
http://www.va.gov it CLEARLY shows a 3.2 Billion dollar increase in
funding. As well as the VA Sec. Principi stating the same thing on
C-Spans Washington Journal in where the VA Sec took calls for over an
hour from people nationwide. You have just been smacked and proven a
liar yet again Crisco.)


Uh, how? Ninety-nine percent? That's a pretty BIG claim from such a
intellectual lightweight (JD or not) as yourself. I'd be interested
to see how you arrived at your "figure"... Again, would you mind
providing an example of such a "lie"??? Since you insist there are so
many of them, it shouldn't be that hard to come up with a couple...

(intellectual lightweight? I have already stomped you three times in
your own reply and you call me a lightweight? So If I am a lightweight
and can best you repeatedly, what does that make you?)


Have you been forgetting some of your meds, Taz?

(are you forgetting YOUR meds Crisco? go to
http://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/cqcgi/@ssa.env?CQQS=Helvering+v+Davis&CQLOCATION=1&Submit=GO&CQ_QUERY_TYPE=2&CQ_PROCESS_LOGIN_X=YES&CQ_LOGIN=YES&CQ_USER_NAME=searchuser&CQ_PASSWORD=%2A%2A%2A%2A%2A%2A%2A%2A
and read the very FIRST link and see just what the US Supreme Court
decided about your mythical trust fund...
http://www.ssa.gov/history/supreme1.html

Now since the US Supreme Court says there is NO Trust fund and never
has been and clearly states just how the Social Security tax monies
are to be spent Just how are you going to call them liars? Especially
since the Social Security Department CANNOT BY LAW go against a
Supreme Court Decision. Game set and match...you have been stomped yet
again and proven a liar Crisco. Why dont you just admit it and stop
while your ahead?)

this part snipped because of the lie it implies

So, Taz... It seems as if our Social Security Administration itself
thinks it indeed has a trust fund. GOP and Democratic administrations
have both been guilty of raiding the fund. As I mentioned before, if
you do not understand a concept, it does NOT mean the other person is
lying. Yes, I do have an MBA and I do understand what a trust fund
is.

(so Crisco, the US Supreme Court clearly said the Social Security
Admin did NOT have a trust fund and the SSA cannot go against a USSC
Decision. As for Both being guilty of raiding the fund...PUH-LEAZE!
The Republicans would have to be in power for over 50 years to come
close to taking as much from the Social Security funds as the
Democrats already have. The USSC said in 1937 that there was no trust
fund and the Republicans didnt take power of the complete Congress
and hold it until the 2000 elections, so the Republicans would have to
hold power in BOTH houses of Congress for 63 years to be able to take
as much as the Democrats already have taken. That is why these morons
scare the pants off the Seniors every election as if the AARP and the
Seniors ever actually found out the Democrats taking money from Social
Security and are the reason that it is going broke...you would see one
Democrat strung up on a light pole every block as hell hath no fury as
a pissed off and lied to voter)

Secondly, the post you provide below? This is YOUR post! You put it
in alt.impeach.clinton and talk.politics.usa. Two groups I've NEVER
posted in or even visited?

(again, see the link above and read the headers and you can see with
your own eyes that Crisco is a total liar on this issue...and then ask
yourself why he is lying so badly about something that is very easy to
prove otherwise)

Where is my post? You can't just create a brand new post and claim
you're responding to a post I initiated! Fer Christ's sake, man...

(fer Christ's sake man...be man enough to admit when you have had your
ass handed to you yet again as I handed you your ass at least 5 times
in this reply alone)

(The Crisco is just getting weirder and weirder folks, and lying more
then ever).

stanley

Why not determine which NGs you are looking at and delete those that are
irrelevant to your discussion?