8th July 09:54
David Kelly and WMD
And after having that pointed out, Ian McFedayeen was further reduced
to snipping every point and playing footsie with some trivial non sequitur.
So, how is such unsubstantiated opinion any better than all
the other lies Bush and Blair pumped out?
No answer? You claim this blokes 'opinion' signifies something,
and yet it hasn't led to a single finding of WMD's in IRAQ!? pffft!
It clearly has all the value of a USSA ariel recon photo of a truck
parked next to a warehouse... enough to convince brain-dead
redneck morons and rusted-on tories like McFedayeen, but hardly
going to convince a thinking person.
(seems all we ever hear these days is certain people's 'opinions', with no
logical basis for them, let alone factual proof B^p)
tory central hasn't published what the party line is on this one yet,
Ian just had to ad lib, so he snipped and ran;
McFedayeen couldn't cope with the obvious comparison between
those who created nuclear WMD's which were actually USED on
civilian targets by the USSA, and some blokes opinions of people
he claims might have been working on something of which no trace can
I can see where hysteria is leading them, but it is pure hypocritical bunk.
I'm sure they were created by nice family men who bounced their
kids on their knees, too. Just like Goebbles.
So far we have 'guilt by ad hom' ad SFA else! B^p
He called him "Dr Germ", eh, that really is dammning evidence!
Of course, El Fedayeen is willing to lynch without trial,
which is why 30,000 Irqaqi's are dead over Bush's lie,
and Hicks is rotting without legal rights or a fair trial,
because when it comes to punishing people based on
no more than OPINION, there is not much difference between
the lynch mob on this side, and the terrorist on the other.
Yes, Kelly WAS referring to THE PAST, he had no more direct
knowledge of Iraqi WMD's at the time of invasion than Bush, who
decided he was going to ivade, and then made up the 'justification' (sic).
Ian Mc Fedayeen can't defend this nonsense, can't ecplain why, if
Kelly had real, factual knowledge, it hasn't led to the WMD's being
easily located, and so he cuts and runs.
Another 'excuse' for war in tatters! B^p
And this below is the most pathetic of all, a claim that when the facts
don't support an opinion, we must not mention the facts because it
insults the memory of the bloke giving an opinion! B^p
McFedayeen is off in cloud cuckoo land.
You musn't say The Emporer Has No Clothes, it is an
insult to his modesty! B^D (and his *****ness! B^)
So, after Howard assured us Hicks will get a fair trial with all the
normal judicial due process (like no lawyer, no charges, held without
trial, no court, no legal appeal, no right to hear all teh evidence.. etc
AFTER Howard assured us, Downer has sent some flunkies off to the
USSA to find out actually how the fix is in, and what type of Kangaroos
will be running the Star Chamber. (He won't protest, he just has to appear
to at least be showing an interest, after all country's where citizenship
actually means something, like Britain, are actually defending the legal
and human rights of their passport holders. B^p