ad

Translation: "The bush folks grow ever more terrified that they might
be swept from power before they can complete the destruction of
America. They are marching every piece of right wing trash with a
keyboard, like this turd starwars for example out to frantically
keep the folks befuddled and confused. As they fail and the appointed
deserter's approval ratings continue to drop, look for more of the
same"

barbara walker

Yes, rarely will you find such factual historical information in the
Washington Post, which instead generally reads like a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the DNC. Thus the comment "By historical standards, our
progress in Iraq is extraordinary." is a statement the Democrats find
disgusting and loathsome. As Rush Limbaugh has pointed out on numerous
occasions, the Democrat Party is at its happiest when things go poorly for
America, and especially when things go poorly for the American military.
Thus the ongoing effort by liberal elite "news" media to keep painting their
sick "one dead American a day" image. What is interesting about that is
that well OVER one American homo***ual male dies every day from his AIDS he
contracted from his penile-**** intercourse with his male "lover", and the
liberal elite could just as easily trumpet THAT on a daily basis so as to
encourage people to cease homo***ual behavior. But that wouldn't be "PC",
you see........

roger

Any evidence of this, or are you just aping what Limbaugh and his kind spew?

If you're going to believe something and proclaim it, you might as well have
some reason to do so, right?


So it must be true? Rush said it? Do you believe it because you believe it
or because he said it? Do you use your brain for something other than a
catchbucket for Rush droppings?

Do you want them to pretend that American's aren't dying? Do you want them
to lie? Or do you just want to hide it somewhere in the back where it won't
reveal the true effects of war?

Not that this has a damn thing to do with the war, but:
I believe those are the condom ads that freaked out the religious right and
had Reagan and Bush back down from running. Or perhaps if former U.S.
Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders was allowed to help remove the stigma from
************ it might be a viable alternative to unsafe ***. But of course
you know how that turned out.

I do have to complement you on your description of *** ***. It is very
erotic.

coondawg

sw is the washington post editorial page writer? if only he were!

youareonthewaytodestruction

And thus begins another recitation of one of the stupidest arguments
for war with Iraq: that 2003 Iraq was just like 1939 Germany, and
therefore war was necessary and just.

In fairness, a similarly stupid argument is made against the war: that
2003 Iraq is just like 1965 Vietnam, and therefore we can only expect
drawn-out guerilla war and boatloads of bodybags before being forced
to withdraw.

In reality, anyone with a high school history class under their belt
should be able to see that Iraq is not Germany, and it is not Vietnam.

In Germany, the population was decimated and war-weary after years of
fighting a war they themselves had instigated, and it was pretty
apparent that a rogue government that had seized power a decade
earlier was responsible for one of the worst tragedies in history.
That was a nation ripe for change. (Of course, that change was a long
time in coming - East Germany, anyone?)

In Iraq, by comparison, a few thousands bombs were dropped,
disorganizing and scattering the official resistance, and a relatively
conservative Muslim people suddenly woke up one morning to find that
the only authority they had ever known had been replaced by white,
beer-drinking, ****-watching, cross-worshipping infidels. Worse,
those infidels were set against any attempt to inaugurate a respected
cleric as the new leader, and instead decided they'd be setting up
camp indefinitely while they pumped oil out of the country to pay
their fees and costs.

Yep... there are certainly differences. Hell, Iraq may look less like
Germany in 1945 than like France in 1941 - a puppet government being
controlled by an invasionary force, with the word "resistance" (say it
with a flourish) on everyone's lips.

Jon

bloomleo1

Unfortunately, most the premisies in this article are naive and some
merely wrong. The resistance in Iraq to American occupation is only
in part from Saddam loyalists. It also comes from Sunnis, Shiites and
others. While there may be some serious fighting among these groups,
none of them, not a single one of them, has sanctioned the US
occupation of their country and all of them, without exception, are
preparing military opposition.

So the one or two dead GI's per day that you're willing to pay to make
**** Cheney's friends rich...it'll be up to ten or so in half a year.
And of course, every one of those dead soldiers will have died in
vain, to make ****ey-Boy even richer. I hope you profited too? No?
Well, think of it this way. You'll work until 65 and get a $50,000 a
year pension. Of course, bread will cost $5.00 a loaf.....Don't think
that far ahead, do you?

So, you've landed us in a ten or twenty year war, for oil,
presumeably, otherwise you'd have to assume George Bush was a
psychopathic killer out to bathe his hands in the blood of children.
Which, btw, fits the data. Oh! I forgot to mention!! We lose the
war.

david hartung

Is this your opinion, or can you back this up?


These past two paragraphs appear to be opinion, it saddens me that an
American citizen thinks so poorly of his fellow citizens in uniform.

ad

Translation: "The bush folks grow ever more terrified that they might
be swept from power before they can complete the destruction of
America. They are marching every piece of right wing trash with a
keyboard, like this turd starwars for example out to frantically
keep the folks befuddled and confused. As they fail and the appointed
deserter's approval ratings continue to drop, look for more of the
same"

barbara walker

Yes, rarely will you find such factual historical information in the
Washington Post, which instead generally reads like a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the DNC. Thus the comment "By historical standards, our
progress in Iraq is extraordinary." is a statement the Democrats find
disgusting and loathsome. As Rush Limbaugh has pointed out on numerous
occasions, the Democrat Party is at its happiest when things go poorly for
America, and especially when things go poorly for the American military.
Thus the ongoing effort by liberal elite "news" media to keep painting their
sick "one dead American a day" image. What is interesting about that is
that well OVER one American homo***ual male dies every day from his AIDS he
contracted from his penile-**** intercourse with his male "lover", and the
liberal elite could just as easily trumpet THAT on a daily basis so as to
encourage people to cease homo***ual behavior. But that wouldn't be "PC",
you see........

roger

Any evidence of this, or are you just aping what Limbaugh and his kind spew?

If you're going to believe something and proclaim it, you might as well have
some reason to do so, right?


So it must be true? Rush said it? Do you believe it because you believe it
or because he said it? Do you use your brain for something other than a
catchbucket for Rush droppings?

Do you want them to pretend that American's aren't dying? Do you want them
to lie? Or do you just want to hide it somewhere in the back where it won't
reveal the true effects of war?

Not that this has a damn thing to do with the war, but:
I believe those are the condom ads that freaked out the religious right and
had Reagan and Bush back down from running. Or perhaps if former U.S.
Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders was allowed to help remove the stigma from
************ it might be a viable alternative to unsafe ***. But of course
you know how that turned out.

I do have to complement you on your description of *** ***. It is very
erotic.