|
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
1
9th May 08:50
External User
Posts: 1
|
Media ignores deficit
The U.S. propoganda machine is ignoring the future effects of the deficit.
http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/guest/51565.php "The London-based Financial Times, in a front page lead story, recently reported the Treasury Department projection that at the present rate, fixing the deficit would require "the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 percent across-the-board income tax increase." The White House deep-sixed the Treasury study. The Post ignored it. " |
|
|
|
2
11th May 12:00
External User
Posts: 1
|
Media ignores deficit
The U.S. propoganda machine is ignoring the future effects of the deficit.
http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/guest/51565.php "The London-based Financial Times, in a front page lead story, recently reported the Treasury Department projection that at the present rate, fixing the deficit would require "the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 percent across-the-board income tax increase." The White House deep-sixed the Treasury study. The Post ignored it. " |
|
|
|
3
11th May 12:29
External User
Posts: 1
|
Media ignores deficit
The U.S. propoganda machine is ignoring the future effects of the deficit.
http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/guest/51565.php "The London-based Financial Times, in a front page lead story, recently reported the Treasury Department projection that at the present rate, fixing the deficit would require "the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 percent across-the-board income tax increase." The White House deep-sixed the Treasury study. The Post ignored it. " |
|
|
|
4
16th May 23:03
External User
Posts: 1
|
Media ignores deficit
The U.S. propoganda machine is ignoring the future effects of the deficit.
http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/guest/51565.php "The London-based Financial Times, in a front page lead story, recently reported the Treasury Department projection that at the present rate, fixing the deficit would require "the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 percent across-the-board income tax increase." The White House deep-sixed the Treasury study. The Post ignored it. " |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
