U.S. Twisted Iraq Intelligence
Ex-Envoy: U.S. Twisted Iraq Intelligence
By JENNIFER C. KERR, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - An envoy sent by the CIA to Africa to investigate allegations
about Iraq's nuclear weapons program contends the Bush administration
manipulated his findings, possibly to strengthen the rationale for war.
That conclusion came on Sunday from Joseph Wilson, former U.S. ambassador to
the West African nation of Gabon, who was dispatched in February 2002 to
explore whether Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger. That desert country is
the world's third-largest producer of mined uranium.
Writing in a New York Times op-ed piece, Wilson said it did not take him
long "to conclude that it was highly doubtful that any such transaction had
ever taken place."
In an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press," Wilson insisted his doubts about
the purported Iraq-Niger connection reached the highest levels of
government, including Vice President **** Cheney (news - web sites)'s
office.
"The question was asked of the CIA by the office of the vice president. The
office of the vice president, I am absolutely convinced, received a very
specific response to the question it asked, and that response was based upon
my trip out there," said Wilson.
Yet nearly a year after he had returned and briefed CIA officials, the
assertion that President Saddam Hussein was trying to obtain uranium from
Africa was included in President Bush's State of the Union address as the
nation marched toward war with Saddam's Iraq.
The British and Italian governments initially reported the possible
Niger-Iraq ties to the United States. Britain issued a public statement on
the matter in September 2002, a few months before the president's speech.
If the British and Bush were referring to Niger, then "that information was
erroneous, and ... they knew about it well ahead of both the publication of
the British White Paper and the president's State of the Union address,"
Wilson said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
He said there are only two conclusions to draw: "Either the administration
has some information that it has not shared with the public, or, yes, they
were using the selective use of facts and intelligence to bolster a decision
in a case that had already been made, a decision that had been made to go to
war."
About a month after Bush's speech, the United Nations determined the uranium
reports were based mostly on forged do***ents. The White House, however, has
maintained Bush's assertion about Iraq and uranium was supported by more
evidence than the forged material.
Wilson served as ambassador to Gabon in the first Bush administration and
later helped direct Africa policy for President Clinton's National Security
Council. More recently, he had argued against using force in Iraq as opposed
to strict containment.
Discussing Wilson's comments, several lawmakers expressed misgivings as they
made the rounds of Sunday's television talk shows about what transpired.
One of them - Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, top Democrat on the
Senate Intelligence Committee - said on CNN's "Late Edition" that it goes to
the question of, "was there an abuse in intelligence, or was the
intelligence wrong?"
He said, "In either case, it's not a happy outcome, and has to be fixed."
Reviews of prewar intelligence on weapons of mass destruction and whether
those assessments may have been exaggerated to justify an invasion of Iraq
are under way in the House and Senate.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030706/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iraq_intelligence_3
|