clu

Hi all !

I need to define a MBV object to be passed through the
remoting framework and returned to the caller.
I'll have a MBR object on my server with a method
returning my MBV.

I'd like to intercept calls to my MBV object locally on
my client in order to do message pre-processing.
So I would derive my MBV object from ContextBoundObject.
In practice, I'd like to have my MBV object serialized to
the client, and then the client have access to it through
the TP/RP couple in order to define my CustomProxy and
pre-process messages to it.

My questions are:

Can I mark as [Serializable] an object derived from
ContextBoundObject ?

If so, my object would still be serialized to the client
context, or it will stay on the server, having just a
proxy at the client ?

Is there any other chanche to have interception without
deriving from MBRObject/ContexBoundObject ?

Thanks in advance for your replies !

Clu

sebastien lambla

By default your CBO will be marhsalled. You can still mark it as
Serializable, but you would have to do the serialization manually. And
frankly, there's no point as in that case your proxy wouldn't be created.
As a side note, what you want is basically to get your object from the
server and use it locally, and intercept locally all the calls through a
proxy... This is going to be non trivial frankly, as even if you do
serialize your object, find a way to transfer it back to the client and
execute it, you still need it on the client side as an assembly (so that it
can be instantiated), and you need the proxy.

Why don't you just :
1. Execute the CBO locally
2. Execute the CBO remotely and don't care about serialization? In that
case, you don't even need a CBO, an MBR will be enough as you already cross
a boundary.

--
Sebastien Lambla
http://thetechnologist.is-a-geek.com/blog/


"Clu" <claudio.brotto@softeco.it> a écrit dans le message de news:
3bf701c3aa7f$f20bbd50$a601280a@phx.gbl...