![]() |
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
|
2
3rd April 23:05
External User
Posts: 1
|
Hello Rob Ristroph
I'll join in on that experience. 2 main boards, 3 hdd's tested. I previously posted about partdisk being greedy... Hours of install atempts later.... Replicateable steps and work around: (with the aid of TomsRTBT linux 2.88 on CD) 1. Cleanup boot Linux (I use TomsRtbt), execute dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=1k count=10000 Zeroing just the mbr (bs=512 count=1) leads to the side effect later if the same partitions are created again, plan9 fdisk will find the old partitions. So the count value clobbers a bit more. Beware if you have other partitions!!!!! Does anyone know where plan9 keeps the "sub partitions info so I could kill that more "point blank"?? Then again prepdisk should not pick up historic entries... 2. partitions if you go to plan9 it cannot create partitions properly (as the others described: In my case creating a partition less than the total hdd size, resulted in the installer going back to partdisk. Inspecting what it had done from Linux fdisk, I found a partion entry which had the proper boundaries, but type set to "0". I tried lots of variants of that theme none worked. Even giving it the whole disk (20GB) is useless since the MBR does not work. Other fdisks (non plan9) cough up about the format of the entries at times. Soooo.... stay in Linux In Linux fdisk: create a new, blank partition table if working on a zeroed disk. Write that. Now create the partions for plan9 that you need. fdisk will set them to type 82 (linux) change that to type 39 (plan9, which fdisk knows) Write. Finished. 2b. You did not zero the disk since you are keeping other partitions: use Linux fdisk to create the partitions anyhow. It works. Don't rewrite the MBR from Plan9. 2c. using DOS fdisk /mbr creates a MBR that is only good for 2GB partitions. 3. Plan9 will be happy now continue with prepdisk, creating fs, swap,... It will see the partition you have created and set to type 39 All the best, Martin martin.althoff@tiscali.co.uk <<<<<================>>>>> Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 6:17:43 AM, you wrote: |
|